Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EAUV5NHEI4XVPZWFUZRL3ZIW2YEV6CHJ/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EAUV5NHEI4XVPZWFUZRL3ZIW2YEV6CHJ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "EAUV5NHEI4XVPZWFUZRL3ZIW2YEV6CHJ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/J2V437YBPI4URABUNCKW5AKRFUZLJW2E/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "zack.kd8ksn (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Zachary Beougher",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements",
    "date": "2011-04-20T13:28:12Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GLDM5VYK3J4OM5TKBNBHKQRWL6SOF3NN/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have TQSL 1.13 and it supports HO68 and SO67.... It is supposedly the \nlatest version.\n\nZack\nKD8KSN\n\n-----Original Message----- \nFrom: KM9U\nSent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:37 AM\nTo: [email protected] ; [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements\n\nI just read the LOTW FAQ and it stated that the satellite name HO-68 is\nsupported by LOTW.\nI have never been able to upload any logs containing HO-68 as the sat name.\nTQSL 1.13 does not have HO-68 in the satellite drop-down menu box.\n\nIs there something I'm missing?\n\nChuck, KM9U\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 22:48\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements\n\n\n> Hi Tom!\n>\n>> When I tried uploading a couple of my satellite QSOs as a test LOTW says\n>> that the MODE field is invalid. I had entered \"SAT\". I know this has been\n>> discussed in recent months here but I couldn't find that discusssion in\n>> looking at the archives. Would someone put me on the right track as to\n>> what\n>> fields are required for a satellite QSO to be considered valid by LOTW?\n>\n> The MODE field refers to the transmission mode - FM, SSB, etc.  The\n> fields related to a satellite QSO are PROP_MODE (this is always set\n> to \"SAT\") and SAT_NAME matches the names in the list at:\n>\n> https://p1k.arrl.org/lotw/faq\n>\n> I'm pretty sure Rick e-mailed you the PDF written by N5JB that shows\n> the 7 fields that must be present for a valid satellite QSO in LOTW,\n> including the two I mentioned above.  Others can be added, but are\n> optional.  The document is found at:\n>\n> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/LoTW%20Instructions/N5JB.pdf\n>\n> Hope to see some of our QSOs match up as QSLs in LOTW soon.\n>\n> 73!\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\n> http://www.wd9ewk.net/\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}