Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EF5OFFTODGTVX2F57KQ7NTF3BRHZTIZZ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "D7DFF448.942A%[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "EF5OFFTODGTVX2F57KQ7NTF3BRHZTIZZ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/EF5OFFTODGTVX2F57KQ7NTF3BRHZTIZZ/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kj9idave (a) charter.net",
        "mailman_id": "988be3aca87c49459679818fb206efd5",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/988be3aca87c49459679818fb206efd5/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "David J. Schmocker",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] L-band question",
    "date": "2018-10-07T22:37:36Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/G2KOZV72IPTVCXH353KKNES7WCC5W44G/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Everyone:\nA genuine newby to satellites, I plan to get QRV with U/V bands as soon as\nI can (likely few months yet) due to difficulty procuring the orbital ring\nrotors required to clear the trees at my QTH.\n\nMy goal is to work as many DXCCs over time as possible (and probably WAS\ntoo).   Given this goal, is L-band helpful (will there be even 1 or more\nnew DXCC QRV on L-band that is easier or not workable on U/V) vs.\nconventional U/V bands or should I stick with U/V given my\ninterests/goals? \n\nThank you 73,\n\nDave KJ9I\n\n\nOn 10/7/18, 5:31 PM, \"AMSAT-BB on behalf of Andrew Glasbrenner\"\n<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:\n\n>Like most Sundays UTC it is in L/v mode, with an uplink at 1267.358 or so.\n>\n>73, Drew KO4MA \n>\n>> On Oct 7, 2018, at 5:29 PM, Ross Biggar <[email protected]> wrote:\n>> \n>> Hi all,\n>> Is it my receiver or has the uplink on AO-92 gone silent or not\n>>receiving any uplink.\n>> I wan't able to access on the previous pass, and no access on this pass\n>> (at 10.24 NZtime).\n>> AO-85 is ok I could access that with a 4 degree pass ok  30 minutes ago.\n>> \n>> Comments please.\n>> Regards\n>> Ross\n>> ZL1WN\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>>Opinions expressed\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views\n>>of AMSAT-NA.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n>>program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>_______________________________________________\n>Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>Opinions expressed\n>are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n>AMSAT-NA.\n>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}