Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EGCBCMX4AD4SPVKGPIKGZDSRMQPY4N3F/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "EGCBCMX4AD4SPVKGPIKGZDSRMQPY4N3F",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/O5545565BMS3TZSV2AR4G5IIXP7UJ2KE/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n3tl (a) bellsouth.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Tim - N3TL",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web",
    "date": "2009-10-14T01:42:15Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FL3IA5Q5JVWKYA5F6UHZA35QCQP7FTQ6/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ARZN6G7MVGVDBUQQNV5OFUSNPNYLKUT2/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello Luc,\n\nI have some questions. \n\n 1- What is the logical direction, in your opinion?\n 2 - How much would that direction cost, in your opinion?\n 3 - How would you propose paying for that direction?\n\nI look forward to learning more so that I can more fully understand your positioin.\n\n73,\n\nTim - N3TL\n\n\n\n\n________________________________\nFrom: Luc Leblanc <[email protected]>\nTo: [email protected]\nCc: [email protected]\nSent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:05:59 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web\n\n\n\n\n\n\"The new AMSAT CubeSat's initial capability is planned to add to the popular low-earth orbit FM transponder fleet\nallowing hams to continue to use their existing handheld and portable antenna systems. This also continues the accessible\nentry path for new satellite operators to get started. The existing FM satellites are starting to show their age.\"\n\nIt was widely admitted that AO-51 was a mistake years ago as a transponder type satellite should have been chosen instead of a single \nchannel satellite.\n\nIMHO There ia already enough capabilities with the existing fleet SO-50 AO-51 AO-27 ISS cross band repeater for an entry class satellite \nplus many cubes in the making as arisat-1. What we lack is a HEO or some AO-07 like satellite with transponder who will make \ntranscontinental QSO'S possible. Theses one channel satellite are a waste of money compare to a transponder type as many simultaneous QSO'S \ncan be achieved at the same time.\n\nBut theses issues where widely discussed in the past and i'm guessing the AMSAT symposium attendance widely clapped at this announcement!!!\n\nWhat AMSAT-NA will be in the next years \" HANDHELD CLUB\" as written \" to continue to use their existing handheld and portable antenna \nsystems.\" \n\nWrong direction again 180 degrees of the logical course again!\n\nP..S. It is obvious this variation on the same subject proposal will have plenty of time to evolved or to be put in real service only to be \nreplaced by other new proposals. it is  the dog running after his tails syndrome who prevail again. Bottom line is another deceptive \nunrealistic proposal IMHO.\n\nFeel free to agree or disagree but the shrinking AMSAT-NA membership is probably what's is triggering theses proposals a king of safety \nbuoy for the BOD to avoid drowning the whole crew and her ship.\n\"-\"\n\n\nLuc Leblanc VE2DWE\nSkype VE2DWE\nwww.qsl.net/ve2dwe\nDSTAR urcall VE2DWE\nWAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE\n\n\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}