Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EIUZDZBQMBYYKVHIH4MH3BC7FT2DB6YX/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "EIUZDZBQMBYYKVHIH4MH3BC7FT2DB6YX",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/U3XAHY2KRLXVXM3FL77NP6YGDZVRUMIB/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gordonjcp (a) gjcp.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Gordon JC Pearce",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: FO29 and Kenwood TH-F6A",
    "date": "2012-01-01T01:21:44Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OBQPUDGUHW6QPEFJUVWOVE7WQELXTSKU/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 00:09:46 -0000\n\"John Geiger\" <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Glad to hear that FO29 is back-now to get on it!  Has anyone tried using a \n> Kenwood TH-F6A HT to receive FO29, since it does receive SSB?  I would be \n> hooking it to an external antenna.  Is it sensitive enough on SSB to hear \n> the satellite?  The QST review shows its sensitivity is a little down on HF \n> and 6m SSB.\n\nEasily.\n\nGet a decent hand-portable Yagi and have at it.\n\nIt's a shame that AO-51 is no longer with us, that was my favourite \"portable\" sat for using with my TH-F7E and a homebrew crossed dual-band Yagi.\n\n-- \nGordon JC Pearce MM0YEQ <[email protected]>\n",
    "attachments": []
}