Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ELKELP35JW7G3GCX27CLIA467W2EKXMZ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "008301ca71bf$ebc88640$c35992c0$@net",
    "message_id_hash": "ELKELP35JW7G3GCX27CLIA467W2EKXMZ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "almetco (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "c7a5eb4d66ce4a1c96e6528422335a8a",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/c7a5eb4d66ce4a1c96e6528422335a8a/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Greg Dober",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Icom 910H vs. Kenwood TS2000",
    "date": "2009-11-30T13:20:43Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/A5M2DNL5QGLFAH66UR2MVLARY25VSDF6/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GK2SKG7G65ORODOEDTSE2MWHDISX27Y7/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Not trashing the 2000, but when it first came out I sold a TS-450 and an\nIcom 910 thinking that \"one box\" would be great. So, I purchased the 2000.\nWell, within one year, I sold the 2000 and bought a TS-870 for HF work and\nanother IC-910.  I could have lived with it as an HF radio and a UHF/VHF\nrepeater radio.  The \"birdies\" drove me crazy on certain sat frequencies.\nNot sure if that was ever fixed? It had more bells and whistles such as\nadding the sats name to the menu etc, but I thought the 910's receive\ncapabilities were second to none for weak signal work.  I still love my\nsecond IC-910!  Still have the TS-870 too.\n\nOf course, all is one man's opinion.  This could become the \"great debate\"\nthread.  hi hi\n\ngood luck,\nGreg\nN3MVF\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\nBehalf Of Tom\nSent: Monday, November 30, 2009 8:02 AM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Icom 910H vs Kenwood TS2000\n\nI plan to purchase a new home transceiver in the next few months and I've\nnarrowed my choices between a 910H and a TS2000. Thinking only of satellite\noperation (ignoring the HF capability of the TS2000), is there a general\npreference in the Amsat community of one over the other? Reasons?\n \nThanks for your opinions.\nTom, KØTW\n \n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}