Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EPRDP6FDVPOYZWEM5BWZYNVSJEELC5EY/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CAFX2DxBXnRT0okUe6T3600Kv1KWWUBZyr0mEM3YRnrqBXJt_5w@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "EPRDP6FDVPOYZWEM5BWZYNVSJEELC5EY",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/H6TOHJMDLVGYOB5J5UAB4XK3XQFKXRJV/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "cswiger (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Chuck Swiger",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs",
    "date": "2019-05-04T15:19:00Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NJU4FHLG72EK7DUKTCNCORDDVNNBK43N/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I am happy with the moxon - uhf pretty small and wiring can be challenging\nwith the phasing and matching lines. My uhf has a mast mount preamp, vhf\njust 30 ft coax and rtl-sdr at Max gain. Could be better but all I want to\ninvest at first. QFH are highly recommended and you can see then on old\nvideos of the lunar lander :).   Satnogs stations 142 and 216.\n\n\nOn Sat, May 4, 2019, 9:58 AM Dave . via AMSAT-BB <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> I bought a set of egg beaters recently and they seem ok for anything higher\n> than 20 degrees. I'm looking to build a moxon variation\n> http://www.oocities.org/w9bci/VHFUHFSatelite.pdf at some point when I have\n> some free time.\n>\n> Dave\n> N2OA\n>\n> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:19 PM Devin L. Ganger via AMSAT-BB <\n> [email protected]> wrote:\n>\n> > Greetings, programs!\n> >\n> > I'm looking to work with my son (who will be studying to get his\n> > Technician license later this month) on building a UHF/VHF pair of\n> > eggbeater antennas. I've found a few papers online, but does anyone have\n> a\n> > good reference to a detailed design?\n> >\n> > Does the ARRL Antenna book latest edition have any significant coverage\n> of\n> > eggbeaters at all? I have an older version that has nothing.\n> >\n> > Also, most of the designs I see are for a single band. If you're\n> deploying\n> > a pair for satellite operations, do you simply attach them through a\n> > duplexer? I have a Diamond MX-72N that I picked up a while ago for using\n> > with dual Baofengs, but it's been sitting in my drawer since I picked up\n> my\n> > TH-D72A. It has a 1.6~150MHz lead and a 350~460MHz lead.\n> >\n> > Thanks in advance for any pointers you might have.\n> >\n> >\n> > --\n> > Devin L. Ganger (WA7DLG)\n> > email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>\n> > web: Devin on Earth<http://www.devinonearth.com/>\n> > cell: +1 425.239.2575\n> >\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> Opinions\n> > expressed\n> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> > AMSAT-NA.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> program!\n> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> >\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}