Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ET5YS7LY2AYDQ6WP4FR2Z6D7KCNLRGHA/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ET5YS7LY2AYDQ6WP4FR2Z6D7KCNLRGHA/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "ET5YS7LY2AYDQ6WP4FR2Z6D7KCNLRGHA",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ET5YS7LY2AYDQ6WP4FR2Z6D7KCNLRGHA/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rwmcgwier (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Robert McGwier",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: S band or any backup?",
    "date": "2006-09-10T18:41:00Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": ">\"David wrote:\n\n>It would be good to know that the linear backup plans have not been quietly  \n>filed in the waste paper basket.  \"\n\nThe SDX will be subjected to really brutal radiation testing. It does sound sweet to have a transmitter and receiver as linear as the SDX can be.\n\nI do not know anyone who is building the fall back piece and while it has not fallen off the table,  I don't know who is building it.  \n\n\n \n\"Good engineering is important, but planing for the unexpected is  vital.\"\n\nIndeed.\n \n \n\"Incidentally. It occurs to me that a disadvantage of having one major  UV \ntransponder operating 24/7 is that while that concept removes the need for  \ncomplicated scheduling it will occupy 100kHz or so of the 2m band permanently  \nwhich may not be totally desirable in a limited 200kHz  bandwidth. Presumably with \nEagle 2 and 3 under design / construction  at the time of launch they will \nhave differnt bands. - Maybe 2390 - 2400  ish\n\nGood point.  The 7/24 plan does include the digital piece in our plans.  And yes, we do NOT have to duplicate U/V on follow on birds to Eagle.  If P3E goes well and  we see no need for another U/V transponder we can indeed do something different on subsequent Eagles.\n \nEnjoying the debate\n \nDavid   G0MRF\n\"\n\n-- \nAMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,\nNJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman\n\"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.\nYou pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los\nAngeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly\nthe same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.\nThe only difference is that there is no cat.\" - Einstein\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}