Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EVE4Q3MTDFYJCE6T6FCOAJ4XS4JXALXZ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "004d01c86bdb$4f0b4e50$6502a8c0@home",
    "message_id_hash": "EVE4Q3MTDFYJCE6T6FCOAJ4XS4JXALXZ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/EVE4Q3MTDFYJCE6T6FCOAJ4XS4JXALXZ/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "drjay (a) gatordental.com",
        "mailman_id": "03ec26d8e6ac4fe5bd9ca356c4e6515d",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/03ec26d8e6ac4fe5bd9ca356c4e6515d/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Dr. Jay Garlitz",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  SAT contacts and eQSL",
    "date": "2008-02-10T11:51:44Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Question for discussion. Many SAT users use eQSL for confirming their\ncontacts. LOTW does a better job as it tracks both transmit and receive for\nSAT contacts.  Unless I am missing something with eQSL only one band is\nlisted even though that does not accurately explain SAT contacts. Some users\nlist their receive band as the contact band.  If you are going to choose one\nshould it not be the transmit band?  Perhaps this is like the universal\nperplexing argument about which way is correct in setting up the toilet\npaper roll.at least in eQSL's case for SAT contacts.\n\n \n\nJay, AA4FL, reply to [email protected]\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}