Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/F5WQDGAVALFMJP6RGOHSZCG4MBZFOB7E/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "F5WQDGAVALFMJP6RGOHSZCG4MBZFOB7E",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IM35GBOPLN56KJH7DI6GBCJ6MSSK2VAW/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "cathrynm (a) junglevision.com",
        "mailman_id": "dd927be9de5549e997869222a2913d1c",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/dd927be9de5549e997869222a2913d1c/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "cathrynham",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: help with wisp",
    "date": "2008-11-04T17:11:55Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PANYWW5JHYCCVM256USD2KBSOESHKV4T/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "laura halliday wrote:\n> Gordon wrote about WiSP and some other programs:\n>   \n>> Yes, but they're Windows-only, and there is no source code available.  I\n>> don't want to have to buy a very expensive piece of software (which is\n>> closed-source, and therefore insecure and unmaintainable) to run another\n>> piece of closed-source software.\n>>     \n>\n> If you see a need, start writing. This software doesn't appear\n> magically, out of nowhere. Somebody has to write it. Why can't\n> that somebody be you\n\n\nIs pbpg  still being developed?  wasn't that open source?  This might be \na good start, if not.  I always thought the pacsat\nprotocol was a very interesting concept and is a piece of technology \nthat deserves to live on.   Maybe even\nhas uses for distributing content via low bandwidth channels on other \nham bands.   It'd be nice, maybe\nto have a raw library that just did the pacsat protocol alone, without \nall the other stuff, as a basis for building\nother apps.     With a single common cross-platform library as the basis \nfor pacsat protocol programs, that\nwould allow us to more easily improve the system, by updating the \nlibrary, and then everyone's application is\nupgraded.  (This of course, would take some time to build, which \nunfortunately, I have none of -- baah, for\nreal life interfering with such plans.)\n\nWith libraries for the 'weird stuff' then, I think more user apps would \npop  up.  Hamlib, I believe is\na good example,and is still maintained, as far as I know.\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}