Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/F6PXCL5QPPGPY5OCH7HOAICGY3V3JH2U/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/F6PXCL5QPPGPY5OCH7HOAICGY3V3JH2U/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "F6PXCL5QPPGPY5OCH7HOAICGY3V3JH2U",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/F6PXCL5QPPGPY5OCH7HOAICGY3V3JH2U/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "updwrb (a) bristor-assoc.com",
        "mailman_id": "6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "w4upd",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  AO-51 reception report",
    "date": "2009-12-05T22:40:57Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5S53DAYHJ36YYZ45AWHCJ7GR2TEP52SP/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WZSE2UUZ4MPOWJUV5MGJY4G7QAQUG7B5/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NHNCNLEXA4GWZN42M2ZS7SA55B43CEZN/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Since the changes made to AO-51 the other day, it appears I am having \nmore difficulty in copying the bird than others on this list server. \nTonight during the 22:22UTC pass which was at an maximum elevation of 60 \ndegress I was not able to hear the bird as well as I have in the past. \nThe signals had more fade and were about 1/3 of what they use to be. \nAgain, my present antennas have a lot to be desired as I am using a 2 \nmeter homebrew ground plane for the 435.300 reception. Before the \nchanges, this worked reasonable well, now it appears I'll need to do \nsomething different and improve the reception antenna. I am assuming the \ndownlink power is still reasonable.\n\nJust a report of how I seem to fair (or not) with the recent orientation \nchanges of AO-51.\n\nReid, W4UPD\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}