Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FIPPKX4XZUJN6XOPNLQZY5K3OSV2TY22/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "001001cafd5a$50f09af0$6700a8c0@sparkys",
    "message_id_hash": "FIPPKX4XZUJN6XOPNLQZY5K3OSV2TY22",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/Z45C6JHX7AYBQ3S3CT2P3KBB2FQBJOJN/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "sparkycivic (a) shaw.ca",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Auke de Jong",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: 'Zombie-sat' and the clever orbital dance",
    "date": "2010-05-27T05:06:07Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2NMKPW4QCDSHP7XNNWTC54OPST7HGRQ2/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AUITEKVTIDHXILINV2OJY7QPWT4LFHXR/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "If Galaxy 15's transponders are all of opposite polarities, then wouldn't \nthe potential interference be cancelled-out by around -60dB due to the \npolarisation mis-match on both the uplink and downlink paths?\n\nAuke\n----- Original Message ----- \n>> From: [email protected]\n>> To: [email protected]\n>> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:35:54 -0400\n>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 'Zombie-sat' and the clever orbital dance\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>> On 25 May 2010 at 19:36, Greg D. wrote:\n>>\n>> >\n>> > I wonder...  Has anyone at SES considered just turning off their \n>> > transmitter,\n>> > while Galaxy-15 crosses their path, and using it instead?\n>> >\n>>\n>> G-15 and AMC-11 are opposite polarity, and most of the AMC-11 \n>> transponders are\n>> pretty wide, and the main carrier freq of each transponder is right at \n>> the null\n>> between the transponders on G-15.  It should work on narrow signals that \n>> don't\n>> have carriers at the nulls, but I don't think it would work for most of \n>> the wide\n>> transponders.\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n> _________________________________________________________________\n> The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with \n> Hotmail.\n> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\nNo virus found in this incoming message.\nChecked by AVG - www.avg.com\nVersion: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2898 - Release Date: 05/26/10 \n12:26:00\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}