Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FPDWU6IIXLRYZ6UKRUCPMK4AFX2A6XGD/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "BFE1D4E6967C46E799B14B396CD2AB59@TNTCENTER",
    "message_id_hash": "FPDWU6IIXLRYZ6UKRUCPMK4AFX2A6XGD",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "tnetcenter (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "05366e6d2c0a49ddb2ff91e355667842",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/05366e6d2c0a49ddb2ff91e355667842/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jeff Moore",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Icom 910H vs Kenwood TS2000",
    "date": "2009-11-30T19:15:38Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "The IC-910H is officially discontinued by Icom.  It's being replaced by the \nIC-9100 which is a \"dc to light\" \"all-in-one\" box like the TS-2000.  The \nIC-9100 isn't yet available in the US - still awaiting FCC approval. \nAccording to Icom, the IC-9100 is a combination of the 746Pro (also \ndiscontinued) and the 910H.  No pricing yet either, but I wouldn't be \nsurprised if it comes out substantially more expensive that the TS-2000. \nIcom plans to debut the IC-9100 at next years Dayton Hamvention.  If it's \nsignificantly more expensive than the TS-2000, I'll buy the Kenwood rig.\n\nJeff Moore  --  KE7ACY\n\n----- Original Message ----- From: \"Tom\" <[email protected]>\n\n\nI plan to purchase a new home transceiver in the next few months and I've\nnarrowed my choices between a 910H and a TS2000. Thinking only of satellite\noperation (ignoring the HF capability of the TS2000), is there a general\npreference in the Amsat community of one over the other? Reasons?\n\nThanks for your opinions.\nTom, KØTW\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}