Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FYGQL7W5TFKKRCIMGTEILP3RVFSW6SYX/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "FYGQL7W5TFKKRCIMGTEILP3RVFSW6SYX",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/D2SHA7WJAIRVODYBTP5GLMVGFY32GAMK/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "lucleblanc6 (a) videotron.ca",
        "mailman_id": "9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Luc Leblanc",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ",
    "date": "2009-05-17T12:09:13Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OA2AEIM6B6TQAT6P2S3XFK7FVK5B7JIF/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/N7EQH6OK333TGG3HOZQ53TW66AT6DUJF/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3SKOBXZXGJEQW3MH7XUBBUYXQLXAIIP5/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/A27DTPL2OBWWBMW2CREHTLHD74MHAHMJ/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 16 May 2009 at 17:27, Roger Kolakowski wrote:\n\nA part of my mystery is solved WiFi and WiMAX I am not a big fan of WiFi as i have some security concern but i discover that i don't have \nthe best antenna for 2.4 and fiddling with it is not an option. A true 2.4 is in the mail to replace it and with 2 antennas now i will be \nable to install them to have vertical and horizontal polarisation and i will see if there is some improvement at 2.4ghz when switching \nbetween them. Nobody answer me back regarding the S band linear \"not circular\" AO-51 antenna but the fades are probably due to some  \nantenna blocking than anything else. On the last S band session me and Clare VE3NPC noted that the fades does not happen at the same time \non our respective QTH there is surely not some selective circular polarisation path?\n\n> This was probably just a typo; if so, pardon the reply...\n> \nI was mixing both...hi \n> \n> Wi-Fi and Wi-Max are different things.  An antenna designed for Wi-Max\n> may not operate very well, as you describe, on 2.4 ghz.  Wi-Fi's\n> 802.11b/g is on 2.4 ghz (channel 1 is right on top of our allocation),\n> so a properly designed Wi-Fi antenna could be good for 13cm Ham\n> applications.\n> \n> >\n> Enjoy the new toy,\n> \n> Greg  KO6TH\n> \n\nSome experimenting to come on the next S band session.\n \n\"-\"\n\n\nLuc Leblanc VE2DWE\nSkype VE2DWE\nwww.qsl.net/ve2dwe\nWAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE\n\n \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}