Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/G25VQPSUDCGPWRW4KHMJR4YK3OK3GB4C/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAN6TEUfUOXU_=Mm2QEgkKu06JY3Bs=mo_8YMFo0QU9wX_bJW-g@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "G25VQPSUDCGPWRW4KHMJR4YK3OK3GB4C",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/G25VQPSUDCGPWRW4KHMJR4YK3OK3GB4C/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "amsat-bb (a) wd9ewk.net",
        "mailman_id": "21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Recap on my radio tests with AO-85...",
    "date": "2015-12-01T20:36:26Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi!\n\nSince AO-85 was launched in October, I have been testing different HTs to\nsee which ones can work this satellite full-duplex and writing about those\ntests here on the AMSAT-BB list. Other than the ISS U/V cross-band\nrepeater, it has been a long time since we have had a U/V FM satellite\n(going back to SO-35 in 1999-2001). To make it easier to reference my\nposts, I'm listing the links to them in the AMSAT-BB archive here...\n\nFor the Wouxun KG-UV9D, I posted my first comments about using that on\nAO-85 early on the Saturday (10 October) following the launch:\n\nhttp://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2015-October/055421.html\n\nAfter additional testing, I wrote more about this radio last week (Monday,\n23 November):\n\nhttp://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2015-November/056189.html\n\nI first wrote about the Wouxun KG-UV8D with AO-85 on the Sunday (11\nOctober) following the launch:\n\nhttp://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2015-October/055462.html\n\nand after additional tests, a post late last Saturday (28 November)\nevening:\n\nhttp://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2015-November/056254.html\n\nI briefly wrote about the AnyTone TERMN-8R just before the AMSAT\nSymposium, on 12 October:\n\nhttp://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2015-October/055493.html\n\nand wrote more about it after testing it last Thursday (26 November)\nevening:\n\nhttp://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2015-November/056232.html\n\nI tried a Puxing PX-UV973 last Friday (27 November), and wrote a report\nabout it that morning:\n\nhttp://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2015-November/056238.html\n\nNot that it really needed to be tested against AO-85, I tried my Kenwood\nTH-D72A HT the same Friday I had tried the PX-UV973. I posted a report\nabout it late that evening:\n\nhttp://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2015-November/056245.html\n\nNone of these reports include the occasions I varied the transmit power\nfrom my Icom IC-2820H 2m/70cm FM mobile radio among its 3 levels (5, 15,\nand 50W) when working AO-85. With all of these radios, my original comments\nabout the KG-UV9D and being able to work AO-85 when the satellite was above\n20 degrees elevation appear to be true for all of these radios when used at\nthe 5-watt transmit power level.\n\nI still plan on finding my IC-W32A and DJ-G7T to try with this satellite,\nas well as trying two-radio combinations. As I try other radios, I'll post\nmy findings here. If anyone else is trying different radios with AO-85,\nespecially HTs (or other radios with low transmitter power levels), please\npost your findings to this list. The AMSAT-BB archives are open to the\npublic, and searchable via search engines.\n\n73!\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPatrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\nhttp://www.wd9ewk.net/\nTwitter: @WD9EWK\n",
    "attachments": []
}