Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/G4UCGI6K626R2FXB5ZCFGC3L7UUNW7CT/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "G4UCGI6K626R2FXB5ZCFGC3L7UUNW7CT",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/G4UCGI6K626R2FXB5ZCFGC3L7UUNW7CT/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk2dag (a) bigpond.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Matt",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: S-Band Not 2.4 but 2.3",
    "date": "2006-09-11T14:34:15Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "VK is 2300~2302 and 2400~2450 Lost most of 2.3 GHz for wireless cable \npaytv broadcast, which by the way failed and is now only a couple of \nnarrowcasts in major cities which are failing too!\n\nJA is 2400~2450 only\n\nZL is 2396~2450\n\nHL is 2400~2450\n\nI see a trend here for region 3!\n\n\n\n>--- Emily Clarke <[email protected]> wrote:\n> >  Currently there is a 5MHz\n> > amateur allocation at 2300-2305 in all three regions and a 10MHz\n> > allocation at 2390 - 2400.  I believe the 2390-2400 is primary as it\n> > appears in all caps and 2300-2305 may also be primary.\n>\n>Neither the United Kingdom or Germany have an Amateur allocation at 2300-2310\n>MHz.\n>\n>The UK's allocation is 2310 - 2450 and Germany's 2320-2450, hence the adoption\n>of 2320 for weak signal (CW/SSB) terrestrial working in Europe.\n>\n>So at present I think only 2390-2400 is common between US/Europe.\n>\n>73 Trevor M5AKA\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}