Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/G7IIO2R6HQUYKIL5CH3NFIF7USSFHBLW/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "G7IIO2R6HQUYKIL5CH3NFIF7USSFHBLW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QMH3MQPRHQYQB6DIPLY7HBJIET7HJ27H/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "bbj (a) innismir.net",
        "mailman_id": "0a00322121654998b9a943e3aa653538",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/0a00322121654998b9a943e3aa653538/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Ben Jackson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Courteous AO-51 Operation",
    "date": "2008-03-19T15:51:15Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QMH3MQPRHQYQB6DIPLY7HBJIET7HJ27H/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CBGHTL4UVV7G6KP3SNKV3UBFHTWJILEK/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nRobert Turlington wrote:\n| hi Ben\n| have read your little piece on courteous AO51 Operation with interest\n| and in general I toady agree with you, my only comment is why only AO51,\n| because the other single channel satellites are almost as bad even the\n| newly resurrected AO16 is a bit of a mad house a lot of the time here in\n| Europe.\n| I therefore suggest you rename your title as 'Courteous Single Channel\n| Satellite Operation\n|\n\nHi Robert:\n\nJohn hit most of the points right on the head but I wanted to just toss\nin my $0.02.\n\nI singled out AO-51 for few reasons: A. It's the one I have the most\nexperience on, B. It seems to be the most popular EasySat, and C. It's\nthe most straightforward to operate.\n\nSO-50, AO-27, and AO-16 all have their specific caveats in regard to\ntheir on board timers, or their \"different\" operating mode. I have never\nworked AO-27 or AO-16 and I didn't want to speak on a subject that I had\nno experience with. SO-50 can actually violate \"Don't transmit unless\nyou can't hear it\" if the timer has expired, and I didn't want attempt\nto make distinctions. Perhaps a SO-50 specific document might be in\norder, but lets cross that bridge when we come to it.\n\nAO-51 was singled out due to it's popularity, and my comfort level\ntalking about it. However, you are right, and most, if not all, of the\ndocument can be applied to other single channel satellites.\n\n\t\t\t\t~Ben\n\n- --\nBen Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA\nbbj <at> innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)\nComment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org\n\niQEVAwUBR+E2cwQiWVsfSvVvAQLGjwf+I5Qt7bLWuCGWCPQfG6DE7GTJgRN6T8ZQ\n0k/tubXxjZ3rEwtxSGhuyZ40esxhUpOajTqtLwWX+04Jv9e2QXLdkoI5iRh6Jjc5\nKbXRR9AYAdkF7ce2gZ9Rne/oTLGa3JO0Jt6BlNCFsNm0tef6ta72oRthlO4PWGpE\nbNoIIE9hTbgkOpTSNgJhInJNBfO5hYQc71IwUiJNB9QigD5H6lZGnWaueDIk0Ahu\n53f/UzGyZE8oGSC03l02NKpUZSEzjA+N8bA32z4hRD2czU6EqbdjfwoNtryu2jGH\n5oDTQ7gfv3UxqSeSEYNfeSIlAxVvPvJKJqSuLRQtbxWWQn7baFwbNw==\n=xGxp\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n",
    "attachments": []
}