Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GG3LTV2JP64OUFQEDNJ25MRDWRJVJENB/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "GG3LTV2JP64OUFQEDNJ25MRDWRJVJENB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6A3YS5BTMAQBVAOWHLIUK64I4ARV63UX/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "amsat (a) n0jy.org",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Jerry Buxton",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] FUNcube-1 AO73 Mode change",
    "date": "2014-11-15T17:14:20Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/S7RT5JTFSX2K7FOQNSDFOIVEUHMZFI5Y/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LFYE4RF7Q43D5QC5I3OB6DTKDPCJCUXP/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Doug,\n\n(I included amsat-bb on this response so that everyone knows where we \nstill appear to be held in regard to U.S. regulations)\n\nI don't believe that the mass properties for Fox-1 have been published \nyet, although you could certainly take a look at the Symposium \nProceedings from 2011-2014 to see if I missed something.  Since I turn \nin the papers on Fox-1 for those publications, I believe I \"know it all\" \nbut hey, that's 4 years to remember. :-)\n\nBeing that control of amateur radio satellites was just transitioned \nfrom ITAR to EAR, and we have not had a chance to get a legal opinion \nregarding EAR and the \"items subject to EAR\" in regard to the \"deemed \nexport\" rules; while I have just taken a look at sections 734.2 and \n734.3 of the EAR to see if I could quickly glean something, I have to \nsay that I feel that it does restrict me from talking openly about the \ninformation you requested in your questions 2 and 3.\n\nThat having been said, while it appears that I could divulge it to a \n\"U.S. Person\" that would mean that we have to discuss it privately and \nyou would have to convince me that you qualify as a \"U.S. Person\" and \nthen you become held responsible for protecting that information, and so on.\n\nSo rather than open a can of worms (or stick my neck on the Federal \nchopping block), I would rather just say that I can't share that \ninformation with you and ask if you might be able to determine what you \nneed to know by asking me something in a way that does not seek specific \ninformation like that, or perhaps make some assumptions yourself.\n\nI am sorry, it is the way we have to conduct ourselves in this activity \nthese days and until we get some strong advice on the legal aspects of \nwhat can and can't be discussed for fear of violating \"deemed \nexports\"... it appears to be similar to ITAR in that regard.\n\n73\n\nJerry Buxton, NØJY\n\nOn 11/14/2014 19:53, Jerry Buxton wrote:\n> Hi Doug,\n>\n> I got your email but I have not responded because I have not had \"a \n> good time for you to call\" yet.  I've been pretty busy with Foxes, and \n> you did not indicate that there was a deadline to respond.\n> If this is what you are interested in knowing, I will let you know soon.\n> The answer to 1 is yes, and none.\n> I'll have to dig in the docs for the answers to 2 and 3, I don't have \n> that information right on hand.\n>\n> Jerry Buxton, NØJY\n>\n> On 11/14/2014 16:54, Douglas Phelps wrote:\n>> I am working on a proposal to the Board of Directors and need some \n>> information.  I have tried Emailing the Engineering Team but have not \n>> gotten a responce.  Perhaps my Emails are not making it through the \n>> system.  I need answers to the following (approx answer are ok):\n>>\n>> 1 - Is Fox 1C carrying any experiments and, if yes, how many empty \n>> card slots remain?\n>>\n>> 2 - Approximate weight, in grams, of Fox 1C without the experiment \n>> cards.\n>>\n>> 3 - Approximate weight of the ballast added to Fox 1A?\n>>\n>> I would appreciate the answers to the above questions.\n>>\n>> Thank You,\n>>\n>> Doug\n>> K9DLP\n>> AMSAT Member\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. \n>> Opinions expressed\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views \n>> of AMSAT-NA.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. \n> Opinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views \n> of AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}