Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GH2LO7B4AXWA3KH2SK7Z6XLCEC764NBU/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "GH2LO7B4AXWA3KH2SK7Z6XLCEC764NBU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/3KLGBXUZSJGY77W5JPHD7LHE6DI3TAVE/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "amsat-bb (a) wd9ewk.net",
        "mailman_id": "21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: DJ-G7 for LEO",
    "date": "2011-04-27T15:19:30Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2YAEJS67RQAKSYNEHKUKWOVTMES36GED/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Bill!\n\n> Is it just de-sense, or lower sensitivity on the sub-band? I have one on\n> loan I am going to try (A-B compare to my FT-530 with the Arrow), as soon as\n> I find a SMA-BNC adapter in my shack.\n\nActually, it's both.  There is very noticeable desense, and the sub-band VFO\nis less sensitive than the main band.  The main band is for ham bands only,\nwhere the sub-band VFO has the wide-band receiver.\n\nYou *may* be able to work with the DJ-G7 using memory channels in the main\nband, but won't have full-duplex operation that way.  I have not tried it using\nmemory channels for the satellites.\n\n> I read the QST review and the author said \"no issue\" except for same-band\n> sub-band, but he is not an experienced LEO user (as he stated in the\n> review).\n\nThe CQ magazine review was also a huge disservice.  The DJ-G7, although\na good radio for non-satellite work and with analog FM at 1.2 GHz (the main\nreason I kept one of the two I bought at Dayton in 2009), is a disappointment\nfor satellite work.  Go with your FT-530 for satellites.\n\n73!\n\n\n\n\n\nPatrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\nhttp://www.wd9ewk.net/\n",
    "attachments": []
}