Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GJ37WU2TM6RUPWWGAUCDE46VTSNX4NFO/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "GJ37WU2TM6RUPWWGAUCDE46VTSNX4NFO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/AL5MKXLMJNTVKQUVDD2J5IDIMUAMR3DZ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "maccody (a) att.net",
        "mailman_id": "b6473a44d40d4c91b7f8bb74bef3b879",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/b6473a44d40d4c91b7f8bb74bef3b879/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Mac A. Cody",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] A suggestion for Experimenter's Wednesdays on AO-91",
    "date": "2017-12-15T05:11:02Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SLD4UKBTK7QVBNEPBRHHMYC3HZ3Z6SM5/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4XXSEEYNQRUXKFLFQS3A5FGU4LPC3ASU/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Patrick,\n\nIf, as you stated, SSTV has run its course, maybe Experimenter's\nWednesdays on AO-85 could be changed to experiment with EMCOMM using\nNBEMS, thereby keeping AO-91 as free as possible.  Once that has\nrun its course, then move on to another experiment.  That would\nkeep things fresh.  I think a report on each experiment would be an\ninteresting series of articles in the AMSAT Journal.  I think\ncontinuous experimentation is a good thing!\n\nMac Cody - AE5PH\n\nOn 12/14/2017 08:33 PM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) wrote:\n> Hi Mac!\n>\n> You offer a good idea. I thought about things like that, but\n> came back to the simple fact that AO-91 still has the \"new\n> car smell\" for being the newest and (in my opinion) best\n> performing FM satellite we currently have. Especially given\n> the recent series of messages discussing the new document\n> Sean KX9X wrote, it might be better to hold off on anything\n> that limits the use of AO-91 to those who would have a\n> computer or other accessories to do the experiment. Once\n> we have another one or two FM satellites, Fox-1C and/or\n> Fox-1D, then it would be a great time to have something\n> else for the weekly experiments.\n>\n> The APRS-capable satellites might be better for what you\n> propose, yes. Unfortunately, there is the issue of the\n> misuse of 145.825 MHz by stations automatically beaconing\n> their existence. Any experiment using ISS or NO-84 would\n> be tougher as you move east across the continental USA,\n> as well as some other parts of the world.\n>\n> 73!\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\n> http://www.wd9ewk.net/\n> Twitter: @WD9EWK or http://twitter.com/WD9EWK\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Mac A. Cody <[email protected] \n> <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote:\n>\n>     Patrick,\n>\n>     This is certainly a fine idea, which may very well gain traction.  If\n>     I may, though, I'd like to propose an alternative experiment. Given\n>     the recent (and ongoing) disaster and recovery in Puerto Rico after\n>     Hurricane Maria,I was wondering how amateur LEO satellites could be\n>     used for emergency response (I know that the use case for the Phase IV\n>     satellite terminal is emergency response.).  While DX and chasing grid\n>     squares is great fun (I do both myself.), I am hoping that there might\n>     be a way that LEO satellites could be used as a public service\n>     resource.\n>\n>     Traditionally, long-distance emergency response has relied upon\n>     shortwave\n>     communications.  It takes a bit of infrastructure cost to set up and\n>     operate a shortwave station.  Effective antenna deployment, available\n>     transceiver equipment, and a sufficient power supply are\n>     considerations\n>     to be addressed.  Perhaps, a pair of hand-held radios (or single full-\n>     duplex), an Arrow antenna, and a computer (Raspberry Pi) could be\n>     used to\n>     send and receive emergency messages via LEO satellites and might\n>     be a viable\n>     alternative.  The messages could be sent digitally via, say,\n>     Narrow Band\n>     Emergency Messaging System (NBEMS) to improve reliability of\n>     transcription.\n>\n>     I'm sure that you or someone else might say \"Use the APRS birds for\n>     emergency response messaging.\".  That may be a fair statement, but my\n>     idea might, at least, be an interesting experiment to try.  An\n>     experiment\n>     is still valuable when it shows that an idea does not work!\n>\n>     73,\n>\n>     Mac Cody / AE5PH\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}