Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GK2SKG7G65ORODOEDTSE2MWHDISX27Y7/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "GK2SKG7G65ORODOEDTSE2MWHDISX27Y7",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ve9qrp (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce Robertson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Icom 910H vs. Kenwood TS2000",
    "date": "2009-11-30T14:03:02Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ELKELP35JW7G3GCX27CLIA467W2EKXMZ/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3CRY6OHHVISTCTZ26LLW2OOVOGZFCOSL/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Greg Dober <[email protected]> wrote:\n> Not trashing the 2000, but when it first came out I sold a TS-450 and an\n> Icom 910 thinking that \"one box\" would be great. So, I purchased the 2000.\n> Well, within one year, I sold the 2000 and bought a TS-870 for HF work and\n> another IC-910.  I could have lived with it as an HF radio and a UHF/VHF\n> repeater radio.  The \"birdies\" drove me crazy on certain sat frequencies.\n> Not sure if that was ever fixed? It had more bells and whistles such as\n> adding the sats name to the menu etc, but I thought the 910's receive\n> capabilities were second to none for weak signal work.  I still love my\n> second IC-910!  Still have the TS-870 too.\n>\n> Of course, all is one man's opinion.  This could become the \"great debate\"\n> thread.  hi hi\n\nI own a TS-2000. I have tried just about every solution for the\nbirdies, and have found none that works well. Thus you have to be\nwilling to lose SO-50 and AO-27 with this radio. Further draw-backs\nfor this rig and satellite work is that the lowest adjustable power is\n5w. I plan to install longish antennas in the near future, and with\nthem my transmit power will be, in many cases, excessive no matter how\nlow I set the TS-2000.\n\nI haven't used an IC-910, but I understand it has an excellent\nreputation. I note that 5w is the minimum power for it also, but other\nICOM radios have an internal pot that allows you to adjust this low\npoint. Does the IC-910 as well? If price is a consideration, note that\nthe ICOM rig will require the purchase of additional filters, whereas\nthe TS-2000 has fully-adjustable filters in place. I very much like\nthis feature.\n\nI am very happy with my TS-2000 as an all-in-one rig, but if I could\nown two rigs, judging by the comments here and elsewhere I would\nprobably get a IC-910 (or a software defined radio with\ntransverters!).\n\n73, Bruce\nVE9QRP\n\n>\n> -----Original Message-----\n> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\n> Behalf Of Tom\n> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 8:02 AM\n> To: [email protected]\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Icom 910H vs Kenwood TS2000\n>\n> I plan to purchase a new home transceiver in the next few months and I've\n> narrowed my choices between a 910H and a TS2000. Thinking only of satellite\n> operation (ignoring the HF capability of the TS2000), is there a general\n> preference in the Amsat community of one over the other? Reasons?\n>\n> Thanks for your opinions.\n> Tom, KØTW\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n\n\n-- \nhttp://ve9qrp.blogspot.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}