Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GVS3KZNQXLVJ5NAPHR46IYL2LVGO7RLI/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "GVS3KZNQXLVJ5NAPHR46IYL2LVGO7RLI",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/TJ4GSBOKPVADYXCVXWDS4BHMT46XLVG6/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "amsat-bb (a) wd9ewk.net",
        "mailman_id": "21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: LOTW - improperly coded satellite contacts?",
    "date": "2011-02-21T18:34:13Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TJ4GSBOKPVADYXCVXWDS4BHMT46XLVG6/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Bill,\n\n> Thanks, Patrick,, I have already sent an email to LOTW.  If the other\n> station failed to include Propagation Mode or Satellite Name, there\n> should be no match at all.  There is no basis for me to be credited\n> with a 144mhz or 432 mhz grid.\n\nI think the queries they use for VUCC \"accounts\" and the ruleset(s)\nyou can define are buggy.  I've run into strange things, reported them\nto the LOTW help e-mail address, then I'm told by the LOTW help that\nthe problem is fixed without further comment.  Don't be surprised if we\nrun into other issues that the LOTW help desk needs to look at, as\nmore of us start using LOTW for grid-based awards.\n\n> I spent a lot of time going through my log before uploading it, as\n> LOTW demands perfection.  The slightest error (e.g., writing vo-52\n> instead of VO-52, AO51 instead of AO-51) and the entry is rejected.\n\nYou are correct on needing things perfectly entered in the logs for\nLOTW.  The satellite names are listed in the LOTW FAQ page, so\nit is easy to make sure you're using what LOTW expects there.\nN5JB's \"how-to\" PDF for satellite operators using LOTW was a\nperfect instruction sheet for me to get started with the uploading\na few weeks back.\n\nAfter taking the time to upload my log from the Excel spreadsheet\nI use into the series of ADI files for each location I've worked from,\nit is a lot easier just to upload new activity.  I put my QSOs from the\ndemos at the Yuma AZ hamfest over the weekend into LOTW on\nSaturday night, and already have 4 QSLs from those QSOs.  I\nhave seen some stations join in recently with LOTW, so the QSL\ncount is always on the move.\n\n73!\n\n\n\n\n\nPatrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\nhttp://www.wd9ewk.net/\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}