Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GWO3LUBMUJHE7VMF5ZTHGKQDJOAX2TKK/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GWO3LUBMUJHE7VMF5ZTHGKQDJOAX2TKK/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "GWO3LUBMUJHE7VMF5ZTHGKQDJOAX2TKK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/S3LZJMS2DZSS3AHAUZZ4RMAAT46R6AJV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ve9qrp (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce Robertson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs",
    "date": "2010-07-27T13:26:04Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MUUZ5LYWRKQOZKIT6TNUQVYBVX3NHOAR/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YF4QUJ2LXI2EVOVA5CQ6BPNQ3OTJ2QFB/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Might I expand this discussion a bit?\n\nAs you might know, I'm working on doppler tuning portable radios. So\nI'd love to know which HTs or mobile radios are sufficiently\nCAT-controllable. My TH-D7A works well, and I assume the TM-700 would\nas well; but looking at manuals, etc., I can't seem to find others\nthat would work. Am I missing  any?\n\n\nOn Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:30 AM, STeve Andre' <[email protected]> wrote:\n> The ic-32at is indeed full duplex.  Can't say about the 24at as mine isn't\n> working right now.\n>\n> On Monday 26 July 2010 21:35:34 John Geiger wrote:\n>> A couple on his list are not full duplex, like the Icom 24AT, and I don't\n>> think the IC-32AT is either.\n>>\n>> 73s John AA5JG\n>>\n>> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Glenn AA5PK <[email protected]> wrote:\n>> > From: Glenn AA5PK <[email protected]>\n>> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs\n>> > To: [email protected]\n>> > Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 7:21 PM\n>> >\n>> > >From a previous discussion, same\n>> >\n>> > topic, an extensive list of full-duplex rigs may be found\n>> > here:\n>> >\n>> > http://thathamkid.com/fd_radios.html\n>> >\n>> > ----- Original Message -----\n>> > From: \"Randy Hall\" <[email protected]>\n>> > To: <[email protected]>\n>> > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 6:37 PM\n>> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Duplex HTs\n>> >\n>> > > Hi\n>> > >\n>> > > I receive emails all time from guys looking for HTs to\n>> >\n>> > use on AO-51.\n>> >\n>> > > Many want duplex HTs to allow them to hear themselves\n>> >\n>> > coming back from\n>> >\n>> > > the satellite.\n>> > >\n>> > > So, what of the current HTs provide duplex operation?\n>> > >\n>> > > Which of the older HTs do duplex. I know my trusty\n>> >\n>> > FT-51 does!\n>> >\n>> > > Plus as a bonus, any of these come with BNC connector\n>> >\n>> > anymore?  I\n>> >\n>> > > really do not like SMAs on my radios.\n>> > >\n>> > > Thanks\n>> > >\n>> > > Randy\n>> > > K7AGE\n>> > >\n>> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HfvmU_utI8\n>\n>\n> --\n> STeve Andre'\n> Disease Control Warden\n> Dept. of Political Science\n> Michigan State University\n>\n> A day without Windows is like a day without a nuclear incident.\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n\n\n-- \nhttp://ve9qrp.blogspot.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}