Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GYAYWOP3X4ZJDUWHCEB5PB3KC7C65LZY/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "GYAYWOP3X4ZJDUWHCEB5PB3KC7C65LZY",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WAO5JGVTH2D2ZRWKN42MIM5GIBRXHMWB/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "brucesemple (a) verizon.net",
        "mailman_id": "bbb35d2e52ce4934af97b62abada6a27",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/bbb35d2e52ce4934af97b62abada6a27/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce Semple",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: TS2000 or FT847 ?",
    "date": "2007-01-02T04:04:53Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2V5CW4K5EPBVOUU2NU6QAZRNRXU4NNB6/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi,\nJust for the record ...\nI am able to use a TS2000 to work QSOs on  SO-50\nI do have a mask mounted pre-amp for the downlink.\n\n73's\nBruce\nWA3SWJ\n\n\n\n\nAt 01:03 PM 12/27/2006, you wrote:\n>Hi,\n>\n>I've used both rigs for sat op's using CAT but the problem with the\n>'2000 is the L/O sprog on the SO-50 downlink (436.8) for which you have\n>to use a second receiver.\n>\n>73\n>\n>Dave\n>\n>Jeff Davis, KE9V wrote:\n> > Be sure to let him know that Yaesu has discontinued the FT-847. Might\n> > not mean much, but he should have that info before making a decision.\n> >\n> > 73, Jeff-KE9V\n> >\n> >\n> > On Dec 27, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Dave Aitch wrote:\n> >\n> >\n> >> I introduced a friend to the world of amateur satellites today.\n> >>\n> >> He was very pleased/impressed to also have a QSO ( Thanks Ib)\n> >>\n> >> Mike is now trying to decide which transceiver to purchase, as\n> >> per the title.\n> >>\n> >> I have owned/used both, but Mike would prefer some other\n> >> opinions too.\n> >>\n> >> Mike wants and all in one box. No argument.\n> >>\n> >> What do you think ?\n> >>\n> >> Any major reasons to choose one over the other ?\n> >>\n> >> Mike is aware of the annoying UHF harmonics on the TS2000.\n> >>\n> >> Cheers,\n> >>\n> >> Dave.\n> >> AMSAT UK 5766\n> >>\n> >\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> >\n> >\n> >\n>\n>\n>_______________________________________________\n>Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}