Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/H3JWWP3WDAONWC5HX5NAXDFESOJRAYJG/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "H3JWWP3WDAONWC5HX5NAXDFESOJRAYJG",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IXZDDZ3IYDHRA6GNHAT3OUZL3HN7N4ZF/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mat_62 (a) netcommander.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Michael Tondee",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: So is P3E essentially dead at this point?",
    "date": "2009-11-11T00:55:32Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3FVPNG7YRWBQQYMOGKOF3NNQIUETBC7D/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Very nice to hear. I do apologize for my earlier characterization of a  \n\"a poor dead bird\". Reading it over, it came out a bit harsher than I \nmeant.  I hope I didn't offend anyone. Thank you very much for your hard \nwork and effort.\n73,\nMichael\nPeter Guelzow wrote:\n> Hi Michael and Alan,\n>\n> I can only repeat what Alan already said...  \n> Work on P3-E is continuing and we are busy looking for launch\n> possibilities and other ways for financing it, i.e. on coat-tails of the\n> P5 Mars Mission.\n> This is our top priority at the moment and that's why you may not have\n> heard so much about P3-E these days. \n> Substantial progress was recently made on the new IHU-3 and getting IPS\n> working on it, the S/C operating system used on all previous P3 satellites.\n> The new IHU-3 is not only essential for P3-E, but also for the P5-A Mars\n> mission..\n> Due to some problems discussed here before, we had to find new people in\n> our own team to do the work.\n> We had some good articles in our past AMSAT-DL Journal, I hope\n> translations will find their's way into other magazines...\n>\n> 73s\n> Peter, DB2OS\n>\n>\n> Alan P. Biddle wrote:\n>   \n>> Michael,\n>>\n>> AMSAT-DL, with the occasional support of other AMSAT organizations, is still\n>> working on getting it launched.  I expect that it will find a ride, probably\n>> unexpectedly, as is often the case.  It would be a tragedy to someday find\n>> the launch article in a museum somewhere.  However, it is clear that\n>> launches beyond LEO are going to be few and far between for amateur\n>> satellites.  Hence the shift in emphasis you have noted.\n>>\n>> Alan\n>> WA4SCA\n>>\n>>\n>>    \n>>\n>> -----Original Message-----\n>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\n>> Behalf Of Michael Tondee\n>> Sent: 09 November, 2009 18:30\n>> To: Amsat BB\n>> Subject: [amsat-bb] So is P3E essentially dead at this point?\n>>\n>> I'm following with interest the post on FM versus linear transponders. \n>> Right now I'm in the middle of putting together and FM LEO station that \n>> can later be made SSB/CW capable with the addition of a new rig which  I \n>> think I may be able to once again afford sometime after the first of the \n>> year.\n>>  I've read all about the new direction Amsat NA is taking and I applaud \n>> it as I think that's what's best.\n>> I still wonder about Amsat DL and P3E though. I don't hear much of \n>> anything anymore.\n>> Last I heard, the figure Arianne space gave for launch was deemed beyond \n>> reach and Amsat DL was going to try and get their government to help. \n>> Just wondering what the status is. Is there still a chance we will see \n>> it in orbit or is it just a poor dead bird mothballed in storage \n>> somewhere now?\n>> 73,\n>> Michael, W4HIJ\n>> _______________________________________________\n>>     \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}