Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/H3QWCXZ3PHJKVOT2S7O2D2EC64PCL5Y5/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "H3QWCXZ3PHJKVOT2S7O2D2EC64PCL5Y5",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/H3QWCXZ3PHJKVOT2S7O2D2EC64PCL5Y5/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n4ufo (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Kevin M",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] CTCSS Sat Tone Operation",
    "date": "2018-04-01T04:52:59Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "> I suddenly realized that there was no CTCSS technology in this radio, but I could never tell while on air, on SO-50, AO-91, or AO-92, today!\n\n\nHi Cee,\n\n\nI'm afraid despite your observation, it DOES matter on SO-50... it will not retransmit your signal without the tone. (unless it's while you are overriding someone else's signal) Please DO NOT transmit to SO-50 without a CTCSS tone of 67.0 Hz as you can and likely will CAUSE QRM. There are a number of terrestrial stations now (cross band repeaters, remote bases, etc.) that transmit on the SO-50 2m uplink without a tone and cause considerable QRM problems. Their strong signals 'collide' with stations trying to talk through SO-50 and it results in at most a squealing crash of signals, but more than likely nothing getting repeated at all. (Sometimes the 'dead air' on SO-50 is because of either this or because too many ops are trying to transmit at once... no one clearly gets through and the tone is not heard by the receiver; SO, it doesn't key up the downlink.) Without the tone, we cannot hear these QRMing stations when they 'transmit in the clear' in order to catch a callsign or a location.\n\n\nJust to be clear... this is the case with SO-50... AO-85, AO-91 and AO-92 are different.\n\n\nThanks & 73, Kevin N4UFO\n",
    "attachments": []
}