Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HCYXBB3KS3KJGCGK3Q3UFISTBVZ5N6JB/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "HCYXBB3KS3KJGCGK3Q3UFISTBVZ5N6JB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/SYF2BZR2GPWTSY45OS4NIHYWJAYMZQ5D/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "Mat_62 (a) charter.net",
        "mailman_id": "171b40085c2e4ecebefde213375137db",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/171b40085c2e4ecebefde213375137db/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Michael",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Fox, \"Easy Sats\"....et al....",
    "date": "2015-07-04T19:54:42Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3JNTARDJZKNLKLMJKD5QFFBAZM2JODNJ/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "  Not at all, My first and only antenna system consisted of a homebrew \ntracking box with point to point wiring and an old pair of  Orbit 360 TV \nrotators topped with homebrew yagis with a modest amount of elements.   \nI'm trying to ressurect it now. My rig was to only semi expensive thing \nI had. If you're trying to make me out to be some snob because I don't \nthink we used the right approach and should have challenged people's \ntechnical prowess, then you're barking up the wrong tree.\nMichael, W4HIJ\nOn 7/4/2015 1:15 PM, Steve Kristoff wrote:\n> So, we should make them only available to the Amateur Radio elite who \n> can afford computer tracked rotors with separate yagis and all-mode \n> full duplex U/V radios? Keep out the riff-raff.\n>\n> Steve AI9IN\n> Riff-raff@EM79\n>\n> ----- Original Message ----- From: \"Michael\" <[email protected]>\n> To: <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2015 1:02 PM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Fox, \"Easy Sats\"....et al....\n>\n>\n>> Once again I feel the need to say that we have gone in the wrong \n>> direction by trying to convince everyone how easy a  \"sat\"  is to \n>> work with a handheld antenna. I got into satellite communication \n>> because of the technical challenge involved, not by how \"easy it was\".\n>>  This whole half or full duplex issue is a symptom of  \"dumbing down\" \n>> There should never be any question on it.  Full duplex should ALWAYS \n>> be used.\n>> 73,\n>> Michael, W4HIJ\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. \n>> Opinions expressed\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views \n>> of AMSAT-NA.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n> Steve Kristoff\n> [email protected]\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. \n> Opinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views \n> of AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}