Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HH5QMVQ2HJHB4RDVOCBXE3LRY2NT4ZXF/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "HH5QMVQ2HJHB4RDVOCBXE3LRY2NT4ZXF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/HH5QMVQ2HJHB4RDVOCBXE3LRY2NT4ZXF/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "nw7d.ham (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "17abf3e8273040cfb8a3221a6fb46e25",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/17abf3e8273040cfb8a3221a6fb46e25/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Gordon Bousman",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  TS2000X vs. 910H ?",
    "date": "2008-12-01T01:44:19Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I'm just about to get started in working satellites and debating between two\nrig options:  Kenwood TS2000X and the Icom 910H.  I already have an HF rig\n(Icom 756Pro-3) so don't really need the HF features of the TS2000X but\notherwise it seems very comparable to the 910H especially when you consider\nthat all the options for the 910H are standard in the TS9000X.  Price-wise,\nthey both seem to be in  the same ballpark (when you add most options to the\n910H).  If you were just getting starting out in satellites, which rig would\nyou choose?  Thanks, Gordon NW7D\n",
    "attachments": []
}