Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HICCXVUQXCWAYIR5ZMJP54LF6DXNXMHF/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HICCXVUQXCWAYIR5ZMJP54LF6DXNXMHF/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "HICCXVUQXCWAYIR5ZMJP54LF6DXNXMHF", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/U5VE4LFE74UCJDJF22E2BSVA3LKGGWHR/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "th.frey (a) vtxmail.ch", "mailman_id": "6008138868c34631bde25697fc2f5ce0", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6008138868c34631bde25697fc2f5ce0/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "Thomas Frey", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: [eu-amsat] Re: Re: Indian Small Satellite Systems Conference -1", "date": "2010-05-05T21:20:49Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LXTCENFQ6FKUBAOQ7IGZIHPVKNFCP6Q3/?format=api", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Bruce Robertson schrieb:\n> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Thomas Frey<[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n>> Luc Leblanc schrieb:\n>> \n>>> \n>>>> \n>>>>> Hi All\n>>>>>\n>>>>> \n>>>> \n>>>>> Amsat India has 2 linear tranponders ready and we Amsat India are asking\n>>>>> ISRO for a higher orbit to cover a larger foot print and longer pass\n>>>>> duration.\n>>>>>\n>>>>> Best regards\n>>>>> Pop\n>>>>> VU2POP\n>>>>> Dir Technical\n>>>>> Amsat India\n>>>>>\n>>>>> \n>>>> Hi Pop, VU2POP\n>>>>\n>>>> I am very happy to know that AMSAT India plan to launch a new\n>>>> satellite with 2 linear transponders in a higher orbit covering a\n>>>> larger foot print in comparison of the actual VO-52\n>>>>\n>>>> VO-52 continually operating with its linear transponders during all\n>>>> available orbits is a reliable satellite for the amateur radio satellite\n>>>> communications and as well for educational purposes.\n>>>>\n>>>> Congratulations to Amsat India and to ISRO\n>>>>\n>>>> 73\" de\n>>>>\n>>>> i8CVS Domenico\n>>>>\n>>>>\n>>>>\n>>>>\n>>>> \n>>> With a little more \"push\" is it possible to have just a slightly elliptical orbit? I don't know what brand of batteries they put in VO-52\n>>> but they probably put a small pink rabbit in it as they don't seems to bother too much with their power budget...\n>>>\n>>> What's is funny is the commenting on the perf board model AMSAT-India was showing couple of years before the launch of VO-52, some where\n>>> commenting on the jumper wire perf board modelling as if it was not something who will never be able to work...\n>>>\n>>> AMSAT-INDIA just doing an excellent and professional job on VO-52 they even put 2 transponder in the same satellite \"too strong never\n>>> broke\". I'm convince their new orbit will cover quite some area on earth..\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> \"-\"\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> Luc Leblanc VE2DWE\n>>> Skype VE2DWE\n>>> www.qsl.net/ve2dwe\n>>> DSTAR urcall VE2DWE\n>>> WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> \n>> If you carefully read, AMSAT-India has 2 Linear-Transponders ready\n>> and not a satellite. As you knows, the satellite VO-52 itself was built\n>> and contributed by ISRO to AMSAT-India.\n>>\n>> If you want a satellite in HEO then support Phase-3E from AMSAT-DL.\n>>\n>> --\n>>\n>> Best Regards, 73\n>> Thomas Frey, HB9SKA\n>> ______________________________________________________________________\n>> \n> I might have missed something, Thomas, but I believe Luc recommended a\n> 'slightly elliptical orbit', not necessarily a HEO one. Do these need\n> to be the same thing? An elliptical MEO would allow for periods of\n> more challenging operation with better opportunities for DX\n> alternating with periods of lower pass loss, but smaller footprint.\n> This might well be something that AMSAT-India could come to ISRO to\n> ask for.\n>\n> Of course, none of this takes away from the excellent work of AMSAT-DL\n> on P3E, which we all eagerly support.\n>\n> 73, Bruce\n> VE9QRP\n>\n>\n>\n> \nHello Bruce\n\nI missed also something of this discussion. I'm only a digest-reader\nof the AMSAT-BB mails. Sometimes its a problem for me when Luc copies\nfragments of discussions into the EU-Amsat group.\n\nDomenico's mail was irritating. AMSAT-India does not plan to launch\na new satellite, they are looking forward, if ISRO would be so kind to\noffer a new satellite structure for their 2 transponders and a launch\ninto a higher orbit. I wish the OM's from AMSAT-India good luck and\nsuccess for this project.\n\nI'm not a specialist for orbits and rocket launches, but every orbit\nis better than a LEO-orbit. I'm aware of that such launches are much\nexpensive than a LEO-launch. There were thousands of discussions about\nHEO-satellites, but Luc wrote a very important thing. If we all AMSATers\ndo not pull at the same string, we would never have such a fantastic\nsatellite like P3E in a HEO. I hope my fellows from AMSAT-DL have anyhow\nsuccess with P3E and the cooperation with DLR (www.dlr.de).\n\nThank You for your support of AMSAT-DL.\n\n-- \n\nMit freundlichen Grüssen, Regards, 73\n Thomas Frey, HB9SKA\n______________________________________________________________________\n\n Thomas Frey, Holzgasse 2, CH-5242 Birr, Tel. + Fax: 056 444 93 41\n http://home.datacomm.ch/th.frey/\n\n", "attachments": [] }