Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HPNYK6TRSBO7WHPVDT24AABXPNV3CDL6/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "HPNYK6TRSBO7WHPVDT24AABXPNV3CDL6",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/HPNYK6TRSBO7WHPVDT24AABXPNV3CDL6/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k6yk (a) juno.com",
        "mailman_id": "9dd495eb5a5b4400ad5e4ad998068d9f",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9dd495eb5a5b4400ad5e4ad998068d9f/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "John W Lee",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Terrestrial repeater interference to AO-27",
    "date": "2007-11-30T02:22:43Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/N5CCIOYX2YHY45MCHUSJ6QA67OBZTCRE/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nWhat I've been hearing on AO-27 sounds like \nsimplex chatter. No squelch tail, etc.  Unless we are hearing\nthe input side of a repeater (the users).  They seem to show up \njust about every day in the afternoon, and I can never understand\nthe callsigns when they give them. \n\n73\nJohn K6YK\n\nOn Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:42:26 -0800 (PST) Bob Stewart <[email protected]>\nwrites:\n> I heard some random non-sat related chatter recently on AO-27,\n> as well as some odd blocking on SO-50.  I haven't gone back in \n> monitor mode, though.  If it starts to be a big problem again,\n> I suppose can start recording the \"good\" pass on AO-27 like\n> last time.  Good point about CTCSS, Drew.\n> \n> Bob - AE6RV\n> \n> --- Andrew Glasbrenner <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> > I talked to one of the control ops via Echolink a few weeks ago \n> and he said \n> > it had been moved. I can't verify it. It was a simplex echolink \n> link into a \n> > repeater. There were actually two of them, one on 145.850, and the \n> other on \n> > 145.925.\n> > \n> > I didn't know anyone else was working on this. Had he not said \n> they had been \n> > moved Riley was going to be my next call! Thanks for your \n> efforts.\n> > \n> > This sort of thing is one of the reasons we shouldn't use CTCSS on \n> satellite \n> > uplinks unless we have to....\n> > \n> > 73, Drew KO4MA\n> > \n> > ----- Original Message ----- \n> > From: \"George Henry\" <[email protected]>\n> > To: <[email protected]>\n> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 4:59 PM\n> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Terrestrial repeater interference to AO-27\n> > \n> > \n> > > Has anyone heard that rogue repeater thru AO-27 recently?  I \n> received a \n> > > phone call from Riley this afternoon, following up on my \n> complaint about \n> > > the repeater, and he wanted to know if it was still on the air.  \n> It is \n> > > located too far from my home QTH to hear directly, and my \n> satellite \n> > > antennas are down at the moment.  The one time I *did* hear it \n> on the \n> > > ground (early October), I was out mobile and much closer to it \n> than when I \n> > > am at home, but I haven't been up that way (northern suburbs of \n> Chicago) \n> > > for quite a while.\n> > >\n> > > George, KA3HSW\n> > > _______________________________________________\n> > > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the \n> author.\n> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur \n> satellite program!\n> > > Subscription settings: \n> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n> > \n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the \n> author.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> program!\n> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> > \n> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the \n> author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> \n",
    "attachments": []
}