Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HQ24I3E6C5RMORBOGVTNWSDKQ6YQA2SF/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HQ24I3E6C5RMORBOGVTNWSDKQ6YQA2SF/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "CAHC1P28qkdH3GqBfGGDNH7mMS+B88OUtvTmi9dAuBG5Cq33MQg@mail.gmail.com", "message_id_hash": "HQ24I3E6C5RMORBOGVTNWSDKQ6YQA2SF", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/AWG7EHDWZAX7CKIWQHQBIBT5CZ5HZUKO/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "af5cc2 (a) gmail.com", "mailman_id": "5cf8802d8c4e4ba09260a676680350af", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/5cf8802d8c4e4ba09260a676680350af/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "John Geiger", "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] [VHFcontesting] [VHF] 5 Band VUCC Award", "date": "2019-04-22T21:13:47Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SCE4M64OGUHQXMCEUOJS5IAPG7MRMLUF/?format=api", "children": [ "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BKRE3X3JL3CWHBLJBZGQUHVPNHHHBWDD/?format=api", "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NXBDU6S42MA5CR5N5KBCTUW25MQHVJPU/?format=api", "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RUDFPNDFN2W6NQ2ERIYPMCVNLVZFCROT/?format=api", "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WUSFJHD5MMG646ZXJLALXXMIAKCXM5DR/?format=api" ], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Probably W2SZ/1, except for the satellite VUCC.\n\n73 John AF5CC\n\nOn Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:32 PM Paul Andrews via AMSAT-BB <\[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> With regards to 5 Band VUCC. I think that satellite VUCC (100 QSOs) is\n> just another band. (more accurate - Sat is a mode)\n>\n> The ARRL identifies 10 VUCC bands between 50 MHz and 10 GHz. Satellite is\n> just the 11th VUCC band.\n>\n> Complete VUCC in any 5 bands and earn the 5BVUCC. Am I missing something?\n>\n> Has anyone completed VUCC in all 11 bands?\n>\n> 73 - Paul - W2HRO\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:58 PM K7XC Tim Marek via AMSAT-BB <\n> [email protected]> wrote:\n>\n> > A 5 Band VUCC award sound interesting. Would it allow existing VUCC\n> > contacts already in LOTW\n> > to be used for credit or require all New & Separate ones?\n> >\n> > Currently the existing VUCC rules however state that Repeater Like QSOs\n> are\n> > NOT allowed,\n> > and that means NO Satellites!\n> >\n> > I agree with the rules as written and cant support adding Non Terrestrial\n> > contacts to a Terrestrial award!\n> >\n> > If we allow this to happen it muddies the waters from that point on,\n> > disrespecting everyone who in the\n> > past worked their butts off to accomplish something not easy to do. The\n> > fact it was hard made the goal\n> > worth chasing. The argument its too hard and discourages others Holds No\n> > Water. If you want something\n> > bad enough you will do whats needed to get it.\n> >\n> > I reject your proposal to include Satellite QSOs with Terrestrial QSOs\n> and\n> > encourage others to do as well.\n> >\n> > 73s de Tim - K7XC - DM09jh... sk\n> >\n> > Adapt, Overcome, Succeed!\n> >\n> >\n> >\n> >\n> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:32 PM Les Rayburn <[email protected]>\n> wrote:\n> >\n> > > John,\n> > >\n> > > My proposal would allow “Satellite VUCC” to count towards 5BVUCC. The\n> > idea\n> > > is to allow the ARRL to create the new award with minimal programming\n> > > changes needed to LoTW and minimal cost to implement.\n> > >\n> > > So far, this suggestion has netted over 40 replies to me in less than\n> 12\n> > > hours. Response has been very positive. I would urge anyone who\n> supports\n> > > this effort to contact their ARRL Section Managers and let them know\n> > about\n> > > the idea—and that you’d like to see it implemented.\n> > >\n> > > In the Southeast Section, we’re lucky to have Greg Sarratt, W4OZK as\n> our\n> > > representative. Greg is active on VHF/UHF weak signal already. Need to\n> > get\n> > > him on the satellites more though!\n> > >\n> > > :-)\n> > >\n> > >\n> > >\n> > > 73,\n> > >\n> > > Les Rayburn, N1LF\n> > > Maylene, AL\n> > > EM63nf\n> > > AMSAT #38965, ARRL Life Member, CVHS Life Member, SVHF Member\n> > >\n> > >\n> > >\n> > >\n> > > > On Apr 22, 2019, at 8:11 AM, John Brier <[email protected]> wrote:\n> > > >\n> > > > Would this proposed 5 band VUCC allow satellite and direct contacts?\n> > > >\n> > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 9:01 AM David Kerl via AMSAT-BB\n> > > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:\n> > > >>\n> > > >> Hello Les,\n> > > >> That should generate some incentive for more V/U/uwave activity. I\n> > would\n> > > >> certainly work towards that end.\n> > > >> Dave\n> > > >> N9HF\n> > > >> el99\n> > > >>\n> > > >> \"Back in my day\" doesn't have a place in ham radio any more.\n> > > >>\n> > > >>\n> > > >> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 10:50 PM Les Rayburn via VHF <\n> > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>\n> > > >> wrote:\n> > > >>\n> > > >>> Lady & Gentlemen,\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>> Not certain if my earlier message was received. No reply from\n> anyone\n> > on\n> > > >>> the distribution list. Here it is again, in case the first one was\n> > > lost in\n> > > >>> cyberspace.\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>> In an effort to stimulate activity on VHF/UHF bands beyond 70 CM,\n> I’d\n> > > like\n> > > >>> to suggest the creation of a Five Band VUCC (5B VUCC) award that\n> > would\n> > > >>> closely mirror the 5 Band DXCC Award.\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>> Successful applicants would need to achieve VUCC status on five or\n> > > more of\n> > > >>> the VHF/UHF bands to be eligible for the larger award. A special\n> > > >>> certificate and pin could be created to honor recipients.\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>> My feeling is that this award would encourage greater activity on\n> the\n> > > >>> VHF/UHF bands, especially on bands that have less use like 222,\n> 1296,\n> > > and\n> > > >>> higher microwave bands. This increased activity encourages the sale\n> > of\n> > > more\n> > > >>> gear, helps protect our spectrum from commercial interests, and\n> > > advances\n> > > >>> the state of the radio art.\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>> Please let me know if you think this idea has any merit, or what I\n> > > could\n> > > >>> do to help support the creation of the new award. As always,\n> grateful\n> > > for\n> > > >>> your service to the hobby.\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>> 73,\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>> Les Rayburn, N1LF\n> > > >>> 121 Mayfair Park\n> > > >>> Maylene, AL 35114\n> > > >>> EM63nf\n> > > >>> AMSAT #38965, ARRL Life Member, CVHS Life Member, SVHF Member\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>>\n> > > >>> _______________________________________________\n> > > >>> VHF mailing list\n> > > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>\n> > > >>> https://w6yx.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/vhf <\n> > > https://w6yx.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/vhf>\n> > > >>>\n> > > >> _______________________________________________\n> > > >> Sent via [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. AMSAT-NA\n> > > makes this open forum available\n> > > >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> > > Opinions expressed\n> > > >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official\n> views\n> > > of AMSAT-NA.\n> > > >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> > > program!\n> > > >> Subscription settings:\n> > https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> > > <https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>\n> > >\n> > > _______________________________________________\n> > > VHFcontesting mailing list\n> > > [email protected]\n> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting\n> > >\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> Opinions\n> > expressed\n> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> > AMSAT-NA.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> program!\n> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> >\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n", "attachments": [] }