Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HTLRTGE4HRL5VYKSDCRJWMHPNNBLXCKH/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "001c01c7c166$741ea9a0$4001a8c0@MainPC",
    "message_id_hash": "HTLRTGE4HRL5VYKSDCRJWMHPNNBLXCKH",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/C63KI26YJTVJONZWJXW45M2AALBCEKCY/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "g7hia (a) btinternet.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "john heath",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Future radical satellite designs",
    "date": "2007-07-08T13:46:57Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/C63KI26YJTVJONZWJXW45M2AALBCEKCY/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nA great posting from Patrick. Good practical commonsense.\n\nA non battery option has been discussed many time on the UK Amsat Midlands \nnet as far back as 2001.\nRobert G8ATE in particular suggested that all satellites should have a \n\"failure mode\" in which the batteries were out of circuit and the \ntransponder ran on solar power. AO-7 is the prime example. What about night \ntime operations?  If the orbit is higher the Sun time for any station is \nextended.\n\nIs a compromise possible, here. A solar only transponder satellite might be \na bit radical, could it be a switchable option?\nTaking up Patrick's point it could be a high power mode.\n\n73 John\nG7HIA \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}