Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HZ4XCYGY5D5T3DB6RX5KTUIJA7CBT22A/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "003e01c8e9ea$68fb0700$6500a8c0@w4hij1",
    "message_id_hash": "HZ4XCYGY5D5T3DB6RX5KTUIJA7CBT22A",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/K4GTEV3NIXLEO5ORVJORBMSTSJKGK2KM/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mat_62 (a) netcommander.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Michael Tondee",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: where all the users",
    "date": "2008-07-19T21:57:16Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/K4GTEV3NIXLEO5ORVJORBMSTSJKGK2KM/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Yes of couse it is John and I can do it that way if need be but I've chosen \nto at least try and make it a little easier. It's possible to still send CW \nwith a spark gap but everyone has chosen to embrace more modern technology \nto do it. I can understand a lot of the bias towards certain things I see on \nthe bb, but computer aided doppler tuning?? Ridiculous....\n73,\nMichael, W4HIJ\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"John W Lee\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nCc: <[email protected]>\nSent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 2:14 PM\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: where all the users\n\n\n>\n> I always thought that was what that big knob in the\n> middle of the radio was for .\n>\n> 73,\n> John K6YK\n>\n>\n> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:47:46 -0400 \"Michael Tondee\"\n> <[email protected]> writes:\n>\n>> I've never been able to get the doppler tracking quite right using\n>> SatPC32.\n>\n> Snip\n>\n>> 73,\n>> Michael,W4HIJ\n/ \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}