Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HZOJNGH7CZ72DNK2ZJEEZRMITOLWYN4F/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "HZOJNGH7CZ72DNK2ZJEEZRMITOLWYN4F",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/HZOJNGH7CZ72DNK2ZJEEZRMITOLWYN4F/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "W3NJ (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Question on ANDE/RAFT/NMARS/FCAL",
    "date": "2007-07-24T00:22:56Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Thanks Bob for the Physics refresher, it's appreciated!\n\ntnx es 73\n\nBruce -W3NJ\n\n\nIn a message dated 7/23/2007 09:21:30 Central Daylight Time, \[email protected] writes:\n\n\n> \n> \n> > Since NMARS and RAFT have both re-entered the \n> > atmosphere, how is it FCAL and ANDE are still \n> > in orbit since they were lauched at the same \n> > time?\n> \n> ANDE was a perfect sphere with no external drag components and\n> weighed 50 kg.  RAFT and NMARS  were less aerodynamic cubes and\n> both had extrnal whip antnenas an hopefully a 4 foot long wire\n> HF antenna (though we think they were not fully deployed)...\n> \n> So ANDE's mass is 15 times as much but it's cross section area\n> is only 10 times larger and much smoother.\n> \n> \n\n<BR><BR>**************************************<BR> Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at \nhttp://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour</HTML>\n",
    "attachments": []
}