Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/I2GUBI4X3QKULEOGJNBZSBIQRJNFBFD2/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "004001c6ddf5$a6bd2ee0$0500a8c0@parents",
    "message_id_hash": "I2GUBI4X3QKULEOGJNBZSBIQRJNFBFD2",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/UPK4RTUGRHTRVDPDYXKITZDIFRCLMXOK/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ka3hsw (a) earthlink.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "George Henry",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Galileo interference on L band",
    "date": "2006-09-22T03:17:35Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GMZU6MWPU7LOWRRL2RMEGVCEVD6HGAHE/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "My point is that no pilot should put all his eggs in one basket, nor does \nany autopilot system rely on one source of data, such as GPS.  There are \nalso data that GPS simply cannot provide (like height above terrain).  GPS \nis not now, nor do I think it ever will be, the \"be-all and end-all\" for \naeronautical navigation.  There will ALWAYS be backup systems to GPS, \nprimary systems to which GPS might be the backup, and systems which GPS \ncannot replace.\n\nThis is probably all moot, as others have pointed out that the Galileo web \nsite makes it clear that the aviation and other \"safety of life\" services \nwill be on channels well-removed from our allocations.\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"David B. Toth\" <[email protected]>\nTo: \"George Henry\" <[email protected]>; \"amsat bb\" <[email protected]>\nSent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:28 PM\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Galileo interference on L band\n\n\n> At 11:08 PM 9/20/2006, George Henry wrote:\n>>Gosh!  How did we ever fly airplanes without crashing them, before \n>>satellite\n>>navigation?\n>>\n>>Show me a commercial pilot who would rely solely on his GPS for \n>>navigation,\n>>and I'll show you a pilot who doesn't belong in the cockpit!\n>\n> With all due respect George, that is an overly emotional and inane \n> comment.\n> I relied on GPS navigation solely on my trip back from the DCC in Tucson \n> ... as well, I used my XM-Radio weather datalink to pick my way through \n> the front created by Hurricane Helene. The VOR receiver would not have \n> allowed me to do all that.\n>\n> And once my Garmin 430 is updated for WAAS , I'll be able to do precision \n> approaches with GPS.\n>\n> ADFs are being decommissioned and I doubt you'll see any new ILS \n> approaches being installed ...\n>\n> No, I'm not a COMMERCIAL pilot, but I fly a lot, and there ARE a lot of \n> commercial missions being flown with GPS alone (with probably 2 GPS \n> receivers on board).\n> AND, GPS improves situational awareness which DOES decrease crashes and \n> other accidents.\n>\n> 73\n> Dave VE3GYQ/W8\n> Spencerville, OH\n> \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}