Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/I3KWYBDPAC7RBR53B2FG2Q4LZYZQDJSM/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "I3KWYBDPAC7RBR53B2FG2Q4LZYZQDJSM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/MGJEIDDMBS4OJJZV3E75HMEKBRNURNG5/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "faunt (a) panix.com",
        "mailman_id": "fea5a111bdd14188b4f0e2ebfecfadc9",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fea5a111bdd14188b4f0e2ebfecfadc9/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Radios for satellite operations",
    "date": "2010-04-17T17:23:37Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7ZRYW5G4BJOPTM3PPILZELYCOUOZXXKW/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Re: K3 full-duplex-  I asked Wayne about this today, at Visalia.\n\nIt's theoretically possible in the hardware, but there's a LOT of\nsoftware/firmware necessary, and no one is working on that.\n\nIt MAY happen, but NOT soon.\n\n73, doug\n\n   From: James Duffey <[email protected]>\n   Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:13:22 -0600\n\n   Can the K3 do full duplex in the same band? Elecraft's FAQ seems to indicate that they do not support this mode:\n\n\t   \"Can the subreceiver provide unbroken audio using any antenna input while the K3 is transmitting?'\n\n\t   \"This is \"full duplex\" operation, which is very difficult to do inside a single cabinet. However, it may be possible if \tyou're using the transverter I/O (0 dBm TX power). We'll be testing this case and will post full specs later.\" \n\n   Does the firmware support this?\n\n   I am very interested in your experiments. Will you need to modify the DEMI transverter IFs? - Duffey\n\n\n   On Apr 17, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Edward Cole wrote:\n\n   > Of course, each to his own choice.\n   > \n   > I decided on the K3/10 (10w version of the K3), with subreceiver and \n   > transverter interface (and a few other goodies) ...total $3000\n   > Add a new DEMI 144/28 xvtr $500, and later a DEMI 432/28 xvtr kit \n   > $400.  These are the new design to be released in early June.\n   > I added a ARR 50-Mhz preamp and building a 300w HF amp kit (cost $150).\n   > \n   > When I have fully investigated running the K3 for full duplex under \n   > sw control I will consider letting my FT-847 go.  Keeping it for now \n   > (also because I will not get the 432 xvtr right away).\n   > \n   > Why not the Flex-500 + U/V?  Well, cost is one, and the need to have \n   > a computer was another.  I will use my 6-lb. K3 for portable mw \n   > operation (mainly CW) so its size, weight and ability to be fully \n   > used without toting along a computer.\n   > \n   > Undoubtedly the K3 and Flex-5000 are the top radios in the amateur \n   > market as far as performance specs.  I've had my K3 for about a month \n   > and am still learning more about it.  Its a keeper.  (better be as I \n   > will never spend this much on ham radio, again)\n   > \n   > 73, Ed - KL7UW\n",
    "attachments": []
}