Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/I4DTBLX32EE7AAX56A7BETLW2JQNAEEA/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "I4DTBLX32EE7AAX56A7BETLW2JQNAEEA",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ANTF3MIO5A4XM7HKF4E2LNCLLNNKRWNH/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk3jed (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tony Langdon",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: A0-51 \"easy sat\"",
    "date": "2008-02-26T20:10:13Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5FVKOAFCINNLT5R6T5SBN2KCKOVIFXZ2/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 10:13 PM 2/26/2008, Ben Jackson wrote:\n>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\n>Hash: SHA1\n>\n>G8IFF/KC8NHF wrote:\n>| I agree with Cliff. Tha same is true with terrestial repeaters.\n>| If you expect a reply then the accepted term is \"CQ\" not \"listening\".\n>\n>I have yet to hear a \"CQ\" on a repeater here in the US. The normal\n>practice here is to announce you're \"listening\", \"monitoring\", or just\n>give out your call sign.\n\nActually, I have seen calling CQ on repeaters suggested in guides on \n\"How to be a LID\" :D.  Over here, it is also customary to announce \nthat you're listening.  I personally don't like the callsign only \napproach (fortunately, it's rare here - only time I can recall \nhearing it is US stations via IRLP or Echolink), it's too abrupt and \nvague, callsign and status (listening, testing, etc) is the preferred \napproach here.  That allows for tests as well. :)\n\nAs the FM birds are essentially repeaters in the sky, most satellite \noperators here use the same convention as for terrestrial \nrepeaters.  Most of the long CQs on FM sats I've heard have been from \nnewcomers who haven't yet sorted out their receive setups (so they \ninvariably trash any QSO in progress :( ).\n\n\n>I've also heard plenty of people reply to this. :)\n\nAll the time, that's how repeater QSOs start, unless someone calls \nsomeone specifically. :)\n\n73 de VK3JED\nhttp://vkradio.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}