Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/I5QJS4BWQFYGE27Q4XDIARGEEC7GTFAV/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "E11C5908B9074E4F8DD28B32DB1F85D4@HildaEichmanPC",
    "message_id_hash": "I5QJS4BWQFYGE27Q4XDIARGEEC7GTFAV",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/3MUZMCTQ5XKLYXLN4AFALTCVSFYCHUZL/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "erich.eichmann (a) t-online.de",
        "mailman_id": "6679c7cde510458f8117afd8289f9948",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6679c7cde510458f8117afd8289f9948/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Erich Eichmann",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: HO-68 Tracking",
    "date": "2010-01-26T09:18:54Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3MUZMCTQ5XKLYXLN4AFALTCVSFYCHUZL/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Peter,\nwhat is your location (locator, longitude, latitude), what are your entries \nfor HO-68 in Doppler.SQF  and what were the predicted AOS and LOS times for \nthe pass you mean?\n\nYou can check that with the Preview function or the list programs WinAOS or\nWinListen.\n\nI never heard that the predictions of NOVA and SatPC32 were different,\nprovided the data are the same for both programs.\n\n73s, Erich, DK1TB\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Peter Scheller\" <[email protected]>\nTo: \"amsat-bb\" <[email protected]>\nSent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:55 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] HO-68 Tracking\n\n\n>\n> Greetings to all.\n>\n> I have 2 satellite prediction programs, NOVA for Windows and of course\n> SatPC32. Since the two\n>\n> do not match in prediction, I tried to find out which one is correct.\n> Anyone wonders about the outcome?\n>\n> Erich, you can relax, your SatPC32 program is superior! But......  Setup:\n> IC-706MKII, outside Arrow antenna\n>\n> mounted on photo tripod at ground level. Computer time adjusted to WWV and\n> newest Keps loaded via internet. HO-68 orbit 547 was an almost overhead\n> pass (here in Hawaii). When I finally picked up HO-68's\n>\n> beacon, the indicated CAT frequency of the SatPC32 program and the\n> MANUALLY tuned frequency of the\n>\n> IC-706MKII did not match, and were far off. By observation, the satellite\n> was lagging the prediction program.\n>\n> When the the CAT window showed a beacon frequency of 435790 KHz I timed\n> this with a stop watch, and\n>\n> waited till the radio dial showed the same. The difference was about 7\n> minutes! and SatPC32 showed HO-68\n>\n> almost out of the foot print whilst it should have been overhead at the\n> closest distance to me. Something\n>\n> is absolutely wrong. A 7 minute time difference is not acceptable. Next I\n> loaded HO-68's Online Satellite\n>\n> Pass Predictions from AMSAT NA. Surprise, the AMSAT predictions accurately\n> mirror the SatPC32 predictions,\n>\n> or vice versa. But are wrong! as measured by the actual event. Any help\n> out there?\n>\n> 73, Peter NH6VB\n>\n> _________________________________________________________________\n> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.\n> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390710/direct/01/\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}