Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/I7TGDTK266AEYBSR5OHHRCI75XW67LX3/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "003a01c6e056$dd08f980$0200a8c0@Tanguray",
    "message_id_hash": "I7TGDTK266AEYBSR5OHHRCI75XW67LX3",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/VDEK7N7RXH7HT2REVP57NZFTM4TIYOWN/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rogerkola (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": "8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Roger Kolakowski",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Why do the amsats get more and more complex?",
    "date": "2006-09-25T03:58:29Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZQBFQMJQYXFQSLQKBKJOO5FSBOWMYULY/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "My Prog Line works just fine thank you and 6BH6's are a dime a\ndozen...plus...less worry about EMP....did anyone else see the Gonset Gooney\nBox amplifier in this week's \"Jerico?\" I know I'm o/t...I'll go back into my\nhole....\n\nRoger\nWA1KAT\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Robert Oler\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>\nCc: <[email protected]>\nSent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 10:52 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Why do the amsats get more and more complex?\n\n\n> Steve\n>\n> \"\n> This is a classic argument. Let's step into a time machine for a\nmoment...\"\n>\n> here is the problem with your point.  I agree that technical advancement\nis\n> important...but to have technical advancement for no real purpose isnt.\n>\n> Unlike most of the modes you mention, amateur satellite communications has\n> really \"not\" caught on in the amateur community.\n>\n> A main reason is that there is not a dependable reliable source of high\n> altitude (or even low altitude) satellites that are the essential\n> part(perhaps the ultimate part) of the equation.\n>\n> Imagine if there were the same number of amateur FM repeaters as their are\n> linear transponders on amateur radio satellites.\n>\n> Do you think we would have gotten much past tube strip line radios?\n>\n> I dont.\n>\n> Robert Oler WB5MZO/5\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}