Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "A3C3147B82D84BB49AE0E4EB26ADF21A@K0TWHOME",
    "message_id_hash": "IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k0tw (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Tom",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  Icom 910H vs Kenwood TS2000",
    "date": "2009-11-30T13:02:24Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ELKELP35JW7G3GCX27CLIA467W2EKXMZ/",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4AHHCRG67GL37TAXIUB5F7DK7JXOTXZH/",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FPDWU6IIXLRYZ6UKRUCPMK4AFX2A6XGD/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I plan to purchase a new home transceiver in the next few months and I've\nnarrowed my choices between a 910H and a TS2000. Thinking only of satellite\noperation (ignoring the HF capability of the TS2000), is there a general\npreference in the Amsat community of one over the other? Reasons?\n \nThanks for your opinions.\nTom, KØTW\n \n",
    "attachments": []
}