Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IEC7UZTNO4JEKO6UJA7UXWLWYR4PUNCO/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "090220071914.22879.46DB0BA60009F1490000595F22007374780E030D989ACE05@comcast.net",
    "message_id_hash": "IEC7UZTNO4JEKO6UJA7UXWLWYR4PUNCO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IEC7UZTNO4JEKO6UJA7UXWLWYR4PUNCO/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "K1UXBMA (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "8ecf4075d474473798bbc7e08b8a5c94",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8ecf4075d474473798bbc7e08b8a5c94/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: doppler.",
    "date": "2007-09-02T19:14:46Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello all.\n\nMy husband Nick (K1UXB) passed away last February 3, 2007.  He had been a Ham operator since age 15.  He was 71 when he passed.\n\nDo you know anyone in Massachusetts (I am in Medford) that needs equipment ?  I can send you Model #'s etc.  He also has lots of huge antennas here at the house.\n\nPlease call if you or anyone you know is interested.  He would appreciate the equipment being put to good use.\n\nSincerely,\nAlice\n\n(781) 395-4509\n\nPlease forward this e-mail to contact anyone who would be interested. Thanks.\n\n-------------- Original message -------------- \nFrom: \"John Hackett\" <[email protected]> \n\n> Hi All, \n> Re: doppler. I've attached K4GMJ's article from the August 1992 \n> issue of Oscar News. It may be of interest to those, like me, who still use \n> old equipment. \n> \n> In addition to Maury's notes, I can mention, I have used an NE 567 tone \n> decoder IC and a LED as the visual receiver with a simple twin-T audio \n> oscillator for the transmitted signal. \n> A simple twin-T osc: is better than an NE555 in this application. \n> \n> I still operate with the Yaesu 290/790 pair + associated homebrew aerials \n> and amps (over 20 years now) and manage quite nicely on VO-52 with \n> InstantTUNE. When set up correctly, the signals track perfectly so even with \n> \"old\" equipment it's still possible to adhere to THE ONE TRUE RULE regarding \n> doppler. \n> \n> I don't tune at all for doppler on AO-7. \n> \n> Occasionally, just for fun, I tune manually ... (transmitter and receiver) \n> .... to keep the frequency constant at the satellite, however ... be aware \n> .... it is *NOT* mandatory to keep the signal fixed at the satellite. Many \n> operators still use the manual convention of tuning the highest frequency \n> .... (because it has the highest doppler rate). \n> \n> This is perfectly acceptable because not everybody is either 1) affluent \n> enough to be able to afford the latest all singing, all dancing multimode \n> rig ... or 2) not experienced enough to cope with doppler on the uplink and \n> the downlink at the same time. \n> \n> 73 John. \n> \n",
    "attachments": []
}