Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IF43A37KDEKWS4EEZJPR2COB32XHZEE2/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "IF43A37KDEKWS4EEZJPR2COB32XHZEE2",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IZ5B6TSOOGFSMNE3R46D2RSKISARC7SY/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gordonjcp (a) gjcp.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Gordon JC Pearce",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR",
    "date": "2013-11-12T09:54:43Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GY3ABGHRBKDYONIFYWBP6LKIVY7CXHPX/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:09:56PM +1100, Tony Langdon wrote:\n> On 12/11/13 12:17 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:\n> >An interesting idea would be trying a FreeDV QSO via satellite. I've made a\n> >few QSOs with it on HF and it's an interesting mode.\n> >\n> >Obviously it's full duty-cycle, so any attempts should be limited to just a\n> >few tests, but I'm sure it would work.\n> I suspect you'd need computer Doppler correction with the FDMDV\n> modem.  The high PAPR would limit the stress on a linear\n> transponder.  The (yet to be finalised) VHF GMSK variant might be\n> easier to handle from a Doppler point of view, though at a higher\n> average power (since it's constant envelope like FM).\n\nYou could simulate doppler by injecting a suitable voltage ramp into your RIT control, making your HF rig \"drift\" in a known way.\n\n-- \nGordonjcp MM0YEQ\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}