Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IFCTVI4EPHUSJXMAVR3R6I2KRKIL2FAC/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "082120071848.23890.46CB3365000DE4E900005D5222155751140B9D04C999@comcast.net",
    "message_id_hash": "IFCTVI4EPHUSJXMAVR3R6I2KRKIL2FAC",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IFCTVI4EPHUSJXMAVR3R6I2KRKIL2FAC/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w7lrd (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 log proposal.",
    "date": "2007-08-21T18:48:06Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello- Many times I'll tell the XYL,\"I'll be in lthe ham shack\".  Four hours later I'll \"surface\".  She'll say, \"who did you talk to\"?  No one I reply, but I had a blast!  Activity does not necessarily you hit the PTT switch.\n73 Bob W7LRD\nSeattle\n\n-------------- Original message -------------- \nFrom: \"John Hackett\" <[email protected]> \n\n> To whom it may concern, \n> I propose that the statistics system of \n> the AO-7 Resource Page log be modified somewhat. \n> \n> Namely ... that the scorecard *NOT* give points when no actual QSO takes \n> place. \n> \n> Further ... that the minimum requirement should be an exchange of signal \n> report and locator for a \n> 'valid' QSO to be added to the scorecard. \n> \n> The reason that I propose this change is that one particular station has \n> claimed 34 points in the last 7 days without having conducted one single QSO \n> .... which makes a mockery of the current scorecard system. \n> \n> While the log was originally intended as an ACTIVITY log ... there are many \n> stations who appreciate the scoring system ... thereby adding to the \n> 'challenge' ... and increasing their awareness of the need for good \n> operating proceedures as well as improving their receiving capabilities. \n> \n> It is unfair that these stations be surpassed by others who don't even have \n> a QSO via the satellite. \n> \n> That is why I propose a modification of the scoring system ... ie ... no QSO \n> = no points. \n> \n> Opinions, comments and 'flaming' to me please, preferably on the back of a \n> $100 note though an e-mail will suffice ... (at a pinch). \n> \n> 73 John. AO-7 Resource Page Log Admin: \n> \n> \n> _______________________________________________ \n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n",
    "attachments": []
}