Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IK25HO3ODZ3JZCZDMZ3P6MNNE4W2AHDG/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "IK25HO3ODZ3JZCZDMZ3P6MNNE4W2AHDG",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IK25HO3ODZ3JZCZDMZ3P6MNNE4W2AHDG/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "Richard (a) g3rwl.demon.co.uk",
        "mailman_id": "3415b4a135da4375b8e385a8b78acc30",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/3415b4a135da4375b8e385a8b78acc30/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: F9FT Tonna 432 skeleton antenna?",
    "date": "2007-03-13T07:56:31Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Dave hartzell wrote:\n\n> Just wondering if anyone knows anything about this antenna.  A couple\nsurfaced and the price was right, but no one knew anything about the\nantennas at the time.\n\nAs you noted, its a 432 antenna not 435, and it is NOT optimum at 435. I had one of these several years ago; I wrote to the company for modification info (to 435) but they never replied.\n\nNevertheless, it WILL work; just not quite as well as one optimised at the higher frequency.\n\n73\nRichard G3RWL\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}