Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IOBNF42UWURKAUH4LRYLXRBARX4XVUNK/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "82B4CEB2D7FC4862BAF3F0DBACBAB84D@QUECREEK",
    "message_id_hash": "IOBNF42UWURKAUH4LRYLXRBARX4XVUNK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7VUPA24MGFKJYOAS3U74YNVDEW5NPQYU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "wb3jfs (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": "bdfc678d05af4f3f96c14d823fd3fbcf",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/bdfc678d05af4f3f96c14d823fd3fbcf/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jeff Yanko",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: VUCC costs",
    "date": "2011-01-24T22:23:13Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/G7PTL4A3RWC5S565BB7KZKC4L4UH5WAZ/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6W6VTF3PII5KMQSDAMLQ46QHGYSVSP4H/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi John,\n\nIt's funny how HQ never came out and stated there would be new fees \nbeginning of the new year.  Then again why would you want to scare away \npotential customers?  In any case, I finally took my cards over to the local \ncard checker to have him verify them for VUCC Satellite.  My cost?  $47.40. \nI understand it's a one time deal for the initial application, which this \nwas, and there costs involved.  Just the 20 cent per QSO fee cost me $27.40 \nalone.  That's more than the award cost itself.  Actually, more than twice \nof what the award cost.  Doesn't make any economical or logical sense if you \nask me.  I don't believe I'll be doing many, if any, endorsements of VUCC at \nthe current fees level.\n\n\n\n73,\n\nJeff  WB3JFS\n\n\n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"John Geiger\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>; \"Amsat-Bb@Amsat. Org\" <[email protected]>; \"'VHF \nREFLECTOR'\" <[email protected]>\nSent: Monday, January 24, 2011 6:07 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC costs\n\n\n>I WAS going to get an endorsement for my satellite and six meter VUCCs, but\n> given that it would cost me around 35 dollars each to get an endorsement \n> for\n> an extra 150 grids, I don't think so. Hope this new insane fee schedule\n> doesn't kill VUCC submissions.  I think AMSAT awards will be getting much\n> more popular.\n>\n> 73s John AA5JG\n>\n> ----- Original Message ----- \n> From: <[email protected]>\n> To: <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 12:25 PM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC costs\n>\n>\n>> Nice explanation of the costs for VUCC in the Jeff Yanko blog. However, I\n>> did\n>> not see what happens with LOTW submisions.\n>>\n>> If the cost of awards keep going up, maybe the ARRL should offer award\n>> insurance\n>> as well as equipment insurance.  Just a thought.  :>)\n>>\n>> Merle, AA4QE\n>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}