Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IRD5J4Y4WJYV3VKPKS2IXOFLCXNENMKB/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "IRD5J4Y4WJYV3VKPKS2IXOFLCXNENMKB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/V77C3GIZS7JFLSQE5Y4SOEFI6VESXCMW/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kenneth.g.ransom (a) nasa.gov",
        "mailman_id": "7a18787420f848ee95993e164e807c2c",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/7a18787420f848ee95993e164e807c2c/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Ransom, Kenneth G. (JSC-OC)[BAR]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: JUBILEE and other frustrations",
    "date": "2008-05-29T14:46:59Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FEIYWLSF2R5B4S654XPOWHNXYPPNYB45/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Seems that IF only a transmitter was included then you must not have\ntaken enough interest in seeing that more was included. Next time, you\nshould be willing to step up and ensure that a transceiver operation is\ninclude. Try addressing the issue before the satellite leaves the launch\npad. If you still have no results, then you have a platform to complain\nfrom. \n\nI'm also a bit concerned regarding the comment about \"our frequencies\".\nMost of these satellites appear to be operating in the UHF spectrum\nwhich amateur radio is not the primary or only group with allocations.\n\nKenneth - N5VHO\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\nBehalf Of John Wright\nSent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 6:17 PM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: JUBILEE and other frustrations\n\n\n >>SNIP\n\n\n> > Honestly, if somebody has put a 45 kg amateur satellite into a 1,500\nkm\n>plus orbit and has NOT included a\n> > transponder,\n\n<<SNIP\n\nThere seems to be a proliferation of satellites using the Amateur \nbands as cheap down link frequencies,  and using Radio Amateurs as a \ncheap way of collecting their data. It is MY personal belief that a \nsatellite should only use our hard-earned and much coveted \nfrequencies if they REALLY do carry an Amateur Radio payload... I.E. \na Transponder! , or, at the end of their commercial life, should be \nput to real amateur use, I.E. a Transponder, promised several times \nbut not often delivered.\n\nOK there are many out there who get satisfaction from getting signals \nfrom anything that is orbiting, to them, I raise my hat\nBUT.. if it is in an amateur band, it should be a REAL amateur\nsatellite.\n\nThis is my view, and I stand here to be shot down.....\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\nprogram!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}