Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ISCM7YORKCK23BFC6M2XCMS4U7T23DCZ/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ISCM7YORKCK23BFC6M2XCMS4U7T23DCZ/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "CAESs-_zzf5FV=hM8T7mc5udGoyOdxmOHpT1K8QymNCihGgvXpg@mail.gmail.com", "message_id_hash": "ISCM7YORKCK23BFC6M2XCMS4U7T23DCZ", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RHKUJCQBCNI3XRHVTJUPCXD3MT3YNWKZ/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "francesco.messineo (a) gmail.com", "mailman_id": null, "emails": null }, "sender_name": "Francesco Messineo", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: LEO-satellites-antennas... ?", "date": "2014-01-07T08:25:26Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PDRRYF2BYIS6DCD6HNFDEKL7SGJYRDAW/?format=api", "children": [ "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7IAHSD6UYNMVMFT2YEMCXKOYUHVSSSVP/?format=api" ], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Hi Pavel,\n\nOn Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Pavel Milanes Costa <[email protected]> wrote:\n> Yes, Omni antenna in 70cm is my head ache now, no rotor yet (arduino is on\n> his way...)\n>\n> I just build a QFH + 10dB preamp on the mast and a RTL... testing it yet.\n>\n> I can copy FO-29 (Beacon and transponder), SO-67 beacon, just heard xatcobeo\n> with short carrier by times...\n>\n> Al this above 30 degrees of elevation... below 30 degrees nothing... hi hi\n> hi..\n>\n> SO-50 is a no go even in a 70 degrees pass...\n>\n> I'm evaluating the parasit lidenblad or the turnstile moxons... any advice\n> based on practice on this two and against QFH? better? worse? the same?\n>\n\nI've worked all the LEO sat available some years ago with a couple of\nlindenblads from AA2TX project. Both with masthead preamp. Radio was\nan FT-847.\nI can remember working AO-07 (cw only) down to very low elevations,\nFO-29 and the Indian satellite (sorry, can't remember the number right\nnow) where the easiest with some passes available also for SSB QSOs.\nAO-27 was easy to work when traffic was not high, also SO-50 was\nworkable and of course the ISS trasponder.\n\n73 de IZ8DWF\n", "attachments": [] }