Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IWYL4IOBCGGGJBIPMYVTVATJ6NJC6YCZ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "IWYL4IOBCGGGJBIPMYVTVATJ6NJC6YCZ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6L4ZDT2DDDLSVGRAXC3OJNVDASKTPODG/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "lucleblanc6 (a) videotron.ca",
        "mailman_id": "9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Luc Leblanc",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 V/S",
    "date": "2010-04-20T18:28:50Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6L4ZDT2DDDLSVGRAXC3OJNVDASKTPODG/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 20 Apr 2010 at 17:38, Bob- W7LRD wrote:\n\nDate sent:\tTue, 20 Apr 2010 17:38:07 +0000 (UTC)\nFrom:\tBob- W7LRD <[email protected]>\nSubject:\tRe: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 V/S\nTo:\tLuc Leblanc <[email protected]>\nCopies to:\[email protected], [email protected]\n\n> \n> \n> Hi Luc and all \n> \n>I am using a Transystem 3731AA downconverter.  Also an old Kenwood TS-700A for the tunable IF.  I have compared Keps 13LNC-PH \ndownconverter against the 3731.\n>The 3731 is virtually immune to desense to 2M tx as well as wifi etc.  However the Keps (pricey) is affected by the 2M tx.  Without the \n>noise blanker turned on in the TS-700 I get lots of snapping, popping from wireless phones, wifi etc.  The noise blanker in this old 700 \n>is superb, better that the one in my 910!  Go figure!  Mind you this is all empirical evaluation using nothing but my ears.  I have heard \n>the filter in the 3731 is better than most.  I will be shipping some of my dc's soon to a fellow who can give a very accurate evaluation \n>on these devices.  Hope this helps Luc, see you on S band! \n> \n> 73 Bob W7LRD \n> \n> \nHi Bob\n\nI have the same DC but my IF is on 123mhz and i got no desense at all on 2M but that's the 2.4Ghz RF your \"snapping, popping\" who i think \nis could be reducing the RF sensitivity of the DC. The AIDC was design to received MMDS TV where channels where isolated from each other \nand they was no other QRM on the original band this downconverter was design for. How he's performing on a band full of QRM that i don't \nknow and it will be something to test to see if the DC keep his same sensitivity when is QRMed on 2.4Ghz.\n\nAdding some sort of flitration is could be a way to reduce any 2.4Ghz desense if any and what the noise blanker does is to suppress the \npops and clicks but he cannot reduce the overall QRM level. \n\nOur regular Ham receiver can be tweaked for the best reception possible but with a DC we are stuck with a static passband, no way to reduce \nthe RF level and so on.\n\nI don't know how wide the AIDC 3731AA front end was but to be able to receive TV signals it should be quite wide and he should pass a lot \nmore than 15KC?\n\n\"-\"\n\n\nLuc Leblanc VE2DWE\nSkype VE2DWE\nwww.qsl.net/ve2dwe\nDSTAR urcall VE2DWE\nWAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE\n\n \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}