Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IXZDDZ3IYDHRA6GNHAT3OUZL3HN7N4ZF/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "IXZDDZ3IYDHRA6GNHAT3OUZL3HN7N4ZF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IXZDDZ3IYDHRA6GNHAT3OUZL3HN7N4ZF/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mat_62 (a) netcommander.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Michael Tondee",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  So is P3E essentially dead at this point?",
    "date": "2009-11-10T00:30:03Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JRUOPIS7PGCU6XXRAVVZITQMCLKNKQGW/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I'm following with interest the post on FM versus linear transponders. \nRight now I'm in the middle of putting together and FM LEO station that \ncan later be made SSB/CW capable with the addition of a new rig which  I \nthink I may be able to once again afford sometime after the first of the \nyear.\n I've read all about the new direction Amsat NA is taking and I applaud \nit as I think that's what's best.\nI still wonder about Amsat DL and P3E though. I don't hear much of \nanything anymore.\nLast I heard, the figure Arianne space gave for launch was deemed beyond \nreach and Amsat DL was going to try and get their government to help. \nJust wondering what the status is. Is there still a chance we will see \nit in orbit or is it just a poor dead bird mothballed in storage \nsomewhere now?\n73,\nMichael, W4HIJ\n",
    "attachments": []
}