Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/J5B66TMIHHCD4IXNUENJ6YJYCXGBZMI4/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAEMY9FcAkmO0gW=4BNHciDCkyegmgWL8OjbqjdJYTpr4nK6hLg@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "J5B66TMIHHCD4IXNUENJ6YJYCXGBZMI4",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7TJWISHF54HRCETPIFJWWL4Z7PTJESHV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kb1pvh (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "946baa6fd780451aa988d177f6f74dbd",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/946baa6fd780451aa988d177f6f74dbd/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Dave Webb KB1PVH",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] WSJT-X FT8 QSO confirmed between W2JAZ and W5RKN on\tFO-29",
    "date": "2017-10-14T14:34:56Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7TJWISHF54HRCETPIFJWWL4Z7PTJESHV/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Ron,\n\n I feel your email is a little like \"Do as I say, not as I do\". Aren't you\nposting repeatedly asking people to use low power on AO-7, and here you are\nattempting a full duty cycle mode on AO-7.\n\nDave-KB1PVH\n\n\nSent from my Galaxy S7\n\nOn Oct 13, 2017 11:18 PM, \"Ronald G. Parsons\" <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> A few days ago, Rick, W2JAZ, asked me if the new, short, weak signal\n> protocol, FT8, could be used on satellites. I posited it might work near\n> AOS or LOS where the Doppler corrections are small. FT8 is operationally\n> similar to the older protocols but four times faster (15-second T/R\n> sequences) and less sensitive by a few dB.\n>\n> So we set out to configure our satellite stations to use WSJT-X with FT8.\n> With some configuration advice from W0DHB, we each got our systems\n> configured. Mine (W5RKN) is a Flex-6500 with two DEMI transverters running\n> SmartSDR, SatPC32, FlexSATPC, and WSJT-X. Rick’s (W2JAZ) is a Flex-5000\n> with U/V module, running PowerSDR, SatPC32, FlexSATPC, and WSJT-X.\n>\n> After a couple runs on AO-7 without success, we tried again tonight on the\n> 0220Z (14 Oct) pass of FO-29. I started out at my AOS calling CQ W5RKN\n> EM10. After several transmissions without success, the reply W5RKN W2JAZ\n> FN29 popped up on the screen. Then followed the usual signal report, RRR\n> and 73 transmissions.\n>\n> As soon as I can figure out the appropriate fields for LoTW, we’ll log the\n> QSO there.\n>\n> I am not aware of other WSJT-X QSOs on the satellites, so I’d be\n> interested in other’s experiences,\n>\n> Ron and Rick\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}