Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/J5KQ45MSWDG3V2NC2AIQNBKC3GYMVT37/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/J5KQ45MSWDG3V2NC2AIQNBKC3GYMVT37/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "J5KQ45MSWDG3V2NC2AIQNBKC3GYMVT37",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/J3ICYSWW4KWBALRQHM5KCNOTPJTODNER/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "dougphelps (a) ameritech.net",
        "mailman_id": "22c1bc80243740a7bc4ce8df79e85d53",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/22c1bc80243740a7bc4ce8df79e85d53/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Best Connectors?",
    "date": "2016-09-07T15:45:21Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7HX3NQ6YEGVBY6OK3RIPB2B45EJMLCYQ/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AARIKE3WIS4ZF3TIQOVJB5V4DVR776KH/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have switched to crimp connectors and I do not think that the shield connections, on N connectors, is any less secure than the \"old school type\".  In every case, the sheild is compressed against the connector body.  Ithink the crimp connector makes a better shield connection.  This topic came up on another group and someone on that group said the military only uses crimp connectors now.  I could not verify his statement but it seems to me that it is much easier to make a reliable connection with crimp than with solder.\nJust my 2 cents worth.\n\n\nSent from Yahoo Mail on Android \n \n  On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Jim Walls<[email protected]> wrote:   I work in the Radio Shop for a fairly large city.  We deal with everything \nfrom WiFi in police cars to a regional UHF T-Band P-25 trunked system.  \nEssentially every RF connector we put on (except hardline) is a crimp type \nconnector.  We have the proper cable stripping, and crimp tools for them as \nwell.  The crimps are FAR faster to install, and when done properly with \nthe right tools, every bit as reliable (or more so) than a soldered \nconnector.\n Personally I really dislike the \"old school\" Type-N connectors.  Had way \ntoo many fail.  The usual failure mode is that the cable is not \nmechanically attached to the connector well enough, and with some handling, \nthe strands of the shield start breaking until the cable pulls out of the \nconnector.  For home use (where I don't own many hundreds of dollars of the \nproper crimp tools), I much prefer the newer Type-N connectors that are put \ntogether more like a PL-259.  Yes, I know that they are not as perfect as \nthe \"old school\" Type-N, they don't come apart.\n  \n  \n Jim Walls\n K6CCC\n  \n\n----------------------------------------\n From: \"Joe\" <[email protected]>\nSent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 8:03 AM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Best Connectors?  \nHi All,\nI till last night thought I found the \"Holy Grail\" of a connector and\nconnector source.\nBut maybe was blown down by a \"Professional\" That does all this \"Radio\nStuff\" for a living.\n\nI always LOVED the old \"N\" connectors. With the big rubber clamping\nthing inside for the shield. And always wished that method was available\non other connectors, even the old PL-259.\n\nA few weeks ago I found them, Like this,\n\nhttp://dxavenue.com/131-465-thickbox/pl-259-clamp-connector-uhf-male.jpg\n\nand I found a source, that is not only CHEAP, but in any combination\nyou could even dream of. So No losses from adapters. Like from LMR-400\nto Male BNC, or even LMR-400 to female SMA.\n\nI bought three connectors.\n(2) LMR-400 to Male BNC\n(1) Male BNC to Female SMA\n\nTotal cost only 9 bucks and 3 days shipping time!\n\nOK, I was sooo happy I had to bring them to the club meeting last night\nto let everyone else know of this find. And a guy that works for a land\nmobile company. They do all the radio work around here for the police,\nFD etc. And he said he wished he knew I wanted them. They got a box of a\nhundred in the storage room. A lot of equipment comes with the\nconnectors like these but they refuse to use them. He said they are not\nreliable and the ground connection fails.\n\nI never heard of this before. What is everyones thoughts here?\n\nJoe WB9SBD\n--\nSig\nThe Original Rolling Ball Clock\nIdle Tyme\nIdle-Tyme.com\nhttp://www.idle-tyme.com\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\nto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions \nexpressed\nare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of \nAMSAT-NA.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n \n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\nto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\nare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n  \n",
    "attachments": []
}